Would coming in thru the ISA server be better than an IIS server in the DMZ
running OWA?  Not leading, just asking, not very familiar with ISA.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Martin Blackstone" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 10:21 AM
Subject: RE: Front-End/Back-End Topology - Ex2K


> SSL
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Matt Plahtinsky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 5:48 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Front-End/Back-End Topology - Ex2K
>
>
> How do you guys secure exchange with OWA and POP/IMAP if you don't put it
in
> a DMZ?
>
>
> Matt
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 8:44 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Front-End/Back-End Topology - Ex2K
>
>
> There should be a rotating tag line appended to each message;
>
> "Exchange doesn't belong in the DMZ"
> "PST=BAD"
> "BLB=BAD"
>
> Etc
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: missy koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 5:22 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Re: Front-End/Back-End Topology - Ex2K
>
>
> Go with your instincts.  Keep it out of the DMZ.
>
> There's lots of history on this in the archives of this list.
>
> Missy
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Myles, Damian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 7:47 AM
> Subject: Front-End/Back-End Topology - Ex2K
>
>
> Posted this on the ISA forums a few days ago, but thought it might be an
> idea to post for discussion.
>
> A while back I tested a FE/BE topology with the FE server sitting on or
DMZ,
> opening numerous ports on our interior firewall to allow AD/GC lookups
> through etc.  Now it comes to actual putting these fruits of labour into
> practice in a production environment, I'm far from convinced of the
> rationale of placing a FE server on a DMZ, given the security implications
> of doing so with regards the numerous open ports.  I'm more inclined to
> allow to publish the front-end server (on our LAN) and allow remote users
to
> connect through HTTPS, secured behind ISA, acknowledging there is always a
> risk putting Internet-accessed resources on a production LAN.
>
> Since this is a back-to-back firewall, the following ports would need to
be
> opened
>
> Exterior Firewall
> -----------------
> 443/TCP HTTPS
> 25/TCP SMTP
> 993/TCP IMAPS
>
> Interior Firewall
> -----------------
> 80/TCP HTTP
> 143/TCP IMAP
> 25/TCP SMTP
> 389/TCP LDAP
> 389/UDP LDAP
> 3268/TCP
> 88/TCP KERBEROS
> 88/UDP KERBEROS
> 53/TCP DNS
> 53/UDP DNS
> 135/TCP RPC
> 445/TCP NETLOGON
>
> I know a lot of the above can be secured over SSL and RPC limited to a
> single port (rather than anything above 1024), and that I can tunnel HTTP
> through IPSEC or VPN. However, since I'm using SecureNAT clients with ISA,
> IPSEC isn't really viable.
>
> Would appreciate any feedback on this and to find out what the general
> consensus of opinion is?
>
> Regards
> Mylo
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>

_________________________________________________________________
List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to