Besides, how does it slow down mail? It will try once, and retry
later....That's it. It isn't like the message is looping.
IMS is multithreaded. It can handle more than one message at a time.

-----Original Message-----
From: missy koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Sunday, March 24, 2002 7:49 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: IMC Queues


For heaven's sweet sakes, if you get uptight about this then you don't have
enough stuff to do.  It's not worth worrying over.  Unless you've got 10K
messages in your queues, you're fine.  And even then you're probably fine.

Missy
----- Original Message -----
From: "Chris Haaker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, March 23, 2002 8:49 PM
Subject: Re: IMC Queues


Mostly because It slows the hell out of all my incoming/outgoing external
mail .  .  . and I dont particularly like the idea of someone flooding my
boxes with bogus mail . . .

----- Original Message -----
From: "Chris Scharff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, March 23, 2002 6:57 PM
Subject: RE: IMC Queues


> Why would you want to stop NDRs, read and delivery receipts from being 
> delivered to senders? If the sender is bogus the messages are
eventually
> dropped.
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> Chris Scharff - MCSE, Exchange MVP 512.652.4500 x244
> Senior Sales Engineer MessageOne
> ------------------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Chris Haaker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Saturday, March 23, 2002 11:34 AM
> > To: Exchange Discussions
> > Subject: Re: IMC Queues
> >
> >
> > After finally finding the answer (I think) at Trend's site . . .
> >
> > Note that this unknown recipient problem does not occur for SMTP 
> > servers like Exchange Internet Mail Service. When InterScan tries to 
> > deliver to an unknown recipient to Exchange IMicrosoft, Exchange 
> > does not reject the message outright, like what Sendmail does. Only 
> > when the message has been accepted does Exchange find out the 
> > recipient is bogus, and then sends the bounced mail to InterScan as 
> > an outbound mail. So, this mail follows the normal outbound path.
> >
> > my next question would be is there anything I can do to stop this? I 
> > have been going into the IMS queue every couple of hours and 
> > deleting the emails
> >
> > TIA
> >
> > Chris
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Durkee, Peter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Sent: Friday, March 22, 2002 5:10 PM
> > Subject: RE: IMC Queues
> >
> >
> > > The answer is that some spammer, pretending to send from a spoofed 
> > > yahoo
> > address, sent spam to four bad or former addresses in your domain. 
> > The messages you see are the resulting NDRs trying to go back to the 
> > forged and non-existant yahoo address. Feel free to delete them, 
> > they aren't going anywhere anyway.
> > >
> > > -Peter
> > >
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Chris Haaker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > Sent: Friday, March 22, 2002 13:55
> > > To: Exchange Discussions
> > > Subject: Re: IMC Queues
> > >
> > >
> > > Perhaps I am dim but I can only find 1 entry with no
> > replies for IMS
> > > or
> > IMC
> > > queue has <> in Originator Field.
> > > Any other ideas?
> > > The weird thing is there is something like 6 entries for
> > each outgoing
> > > address
> > >
> > > co.boing.com  <>
> > > co.boing.com  <>
> > > co.boing.com  <>
> > > co.boing.com  <>
> > > yahoo.com  <>
> > > yahoo.com  <>
> > > yahoo.com  <>
> > > yahoo.com  <>
> > >
> > > etc. all with the same exact timestamp . . .
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "Andy David" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > Sent: Friday, March 22, 2002 3:53 PM
> > > Subject: RE: IMC Queues
> > >
> > >
> > > > Burrow your way to the FAQ.
> > > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Chris Haaker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > > Sent: Friday, March 22, 2002 3:45 PM
> > > > To: Exchange Discussions
> > > > Subject: IMC Queues
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Looking in the IMC Queue for Outbound Mail awaiting
> > delivery I see
> > > > 10-20 enteries to the same address all with <> as the
> > originator . .
> > > > . Has the worm struck you think?
> > > >
> > > > "It is the province of knowledge to speak,
> > > >             and it is the privilege of wisdom to listen".
> > > >     Oliver Wendell Holmes, Sr. (1809-94); U.S. writer,
physician.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
_________________________________________________________________
> > > > List posting FAQ:
http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> > > > Archives:
http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> > > > To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>



_________________________________________________________________
List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]



_________________________________________________________________
List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

_________________________________________________________________
List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to