We use the content filtering software (MMS) from Tumbleweed. It works, but it is buggy and their tech support is pretty much useless. Tumbleweed does focus on Finance industry, so the support you would receive may be better than ours.
I can't comment on their archive product itself, but I would test the hell out of it in the lab before making any commitment to it. About the pst's, the only better form of storage for them would be in the trash. Give your users larger mailboxes and ban PSTs on your network. Modify your Outlook image so that the service is not even available to the clients. This becomes even more desirable now that you'll have an archival solution. Serdar Soysal -----Original Message----- From: Jonathan Beeler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 2:31 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Email review Being a Securities company, by SEC law, we have to archive and review all internet mail to a non-re-writeable media (it falls under the client correspondance part of the requirement). Our system that we currently use is out of date. We also want to get pst's off of the network into a better form of storage. I group these 2 products together because many of the vendors do the same. We have narrowed it down to these 3 companies. Each have their positives and negatives. Does anyone have any experience with any of these and what are your feelings about them? KVS - Enterprise Vault OTG - Email Extneder Tumbleweed - Secure Archive Thank you for your assistance _________________________________________________________________ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _________________________________________________________________ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
