The receiving mailer must support at least 100 recips.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Martin Blackstone" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, April 23, 2002 4:54 PM
Subject: RE: Mass email question


> Is that on the receiving end or the sending?
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, April 23, 2002 2:53 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Re: Mass email question
>
>
> By "outside the firm" I assume you mean SMTP mail. RFC-821/2821 states
that
> a mailer must support at least 100 recipients; anything beyond that is
> implementation-specific.
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Pillai, Raj" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Tuesday, April 23, 2002 3:01 PM
> Subject: Mass email question
>
>
> > Exchange 5.5 sp4, WinNT 4.0 SP6. Multiprocessor: PIII/866mhz and 868MB
> Ram.
> >
> > Is there a limit to how many recipients can be addressed in an email?
> > One of my users needs to send 400 emails outside the firm. I know it
> > will create a lot of network traffic and bog down the Server. Is it a
> > good idea to break it down into chunks of 50 or so?
> >
> > Thanks for any ideas.
> >
> > Raj
> >
> >
>
****************************************************************************
> > **This e-mail message, including any attachments, contains information
> that
> > is confidential, may be protected by the attorney/client or other
> applicable
> > privileges, and may constitute non-public information.  This message
> > is intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s).  If
> > you are
> not
> > the intended recipient of this message, do not read it; please
> > immediately notify the sender that you have received this message in
> > error and delete this message.  Unauthorized use, disclosure,
> > dissemination, distribution
> or
> > reproduction of this message or the information contained in this
> > message
> or
> > the taking of any action in reliance on it is strictly prohibited and
> > may
> be
> > unlawful.  Thank you for your
> >
>
cooperation.****************************************************************
> > **************
> >
> > _________________________________________________________________
> > List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> > Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> > To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
>
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>


_________________________________________________________________
List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to