Hi Ken, I asked a similar question last week, and Paul Hurst had sent this reply:
--------snip----------- I found that 'Archive one' would have required at least some PF servers unless you want one with 200Gb+ PF store, eCon did not SIS the PST's when migrated back in and was heavy on the install with two CD's and lots of install options (Oracle/SQL etc;) also their pre-sales tech support was very light, but does support UNIX back end servers and uses MAPI to retrieve the messages (good for OST's/Palms). We went for KVS since we could HSM the data, SIS the PST imports set policy's at user level folders and for us in the UK there tech support were on the ball (answered code page problems etc; fast), but does not use MAPI to retrieve so bad for OST's/Palms). ----------------snip----------- My company is currently looking around for an archiving solution, and KVS is one of the ones we're looking at, along with some others. I don't have any valuable feedback yet myself, but I'm hoping that our server guys will be ready for some trials soon... -Christian -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Jasa, Ken Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 9:56 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: KVS Enterprise Vault Has anyone used this product that could provide some feedback on it? Ken Jasa Messaging Manager Weber Shandwick [EMAIL PROTECTED] _________________________________________________________________ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _________________________________________________________________ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
