SMTP and POP only makes a HUGE different on what performance you can get
out of a server.

--Kevinm KMAP-SR, M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond
http://www.daughtry.ca/ For Graphics and WebDesign, GO here!


-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Andrey Fyodorov
Sent: Monday, May 13, 2002 1:31 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Mail Exchangers for NT based systems


Speaking of Imail, I have seen some Imail servers running on crappy
hardware, on Win2KPro, hosting more than 10,000 mailboxes and still
delivering decent performance.

-----Original Message-----
From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, May 13, 2002 3:57 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Mail Exchangers for NT based systems


Merak looks good. Similar to Imail but with more features.

Do you know if it is a good performer?

-----Original Message-----
From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, May 11, 2002 6:06 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Mail Exchangers for NT based systems


I really like Merak mail.  
http://www.icewarp.com/Products/Merak_Mail_Server/

Here's a list from the Microsoft site:
http://www.microsoft.com/ntserver/partners/findoffering/webserv/mail.asp

William Lefkovics

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Randal, Phil
Sent: Friday, May 10, 2002 7:17 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Mail Exchangers for NT based systems


Don't forget David Harris's Mercury/32 from http://www.pmail.gen.nz

Phil

---------------------------------------------
Phil Randal
Network Engineer
Herefordshire Council
Hereford, UK 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 10 May 2002 14:39
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Mail Exchangers for NT based systems
> 
> 
> Rockliffe MailSite (http://www.rockliffe.com)
> 
> IPSwitch Imail (http://www.ipswitch.com)
> 
> Gordano NTMail (http://www.gordano.com)
> 
> Out of these 3, my choice would be Rockliffe Mailsite. It allows to 
> create custom routes, allows ETRN, pretty strong as a relay.
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: matt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 2:17 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Mail Exchangers for NT based systems
> 
> 
> stalker cgate pro
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Couch, Nate [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 2:03 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Mail Exchangers for NT based systems
> 
> 
> Anyone have any preferences for mail exchangers which run on the 
> Windows NT 4.x platform?
> 
> I am aware of XMail, but woould like some other options if you have 
> them.
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> Nate Couch
> EDS Messaging
> __________________________________
>


_________________________________________________________________
List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

_________________________________________________________________
List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

_________________________________________________________________
List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]


_________________________________________________________________
List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to