Does the DNS stop resolving everything, including internal resources, or
is it just a problem with external resources?

-----Original Message-----
From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 12:45 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Win2K DNS is PISSING ME OFF

Haven't done NetMon yet.

There are no errors in the logs. Only warnings that the DNS server
received
an invalid packet from this or that IP address (some of those IP
addresses
are our BIND DNS servers)

When it gets hosed, it even stops resolving names that are already in
the
cache. For example I could be sitting in NSLOOKUP, punching in
edmunds.com,
edmunds.com... no problem... all of a sudden, edmunds.com - request
timed-out.

Tried running NSLOOKUP -d2 and when it fails, the last thing it says is
"SendRequest failed"


Thanks for your help. I will see if I can run NetMon on it.

-----Original Message-----
From: Thomas Di Nardo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 12:29 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Win2K DNS is PISSING ME OFF


Have you run a netmon to see what the box is doing when it gets hosed?
Are there any errors in the logs? Is it still resolving stuff in the
cache, but not anything new?

-----Original Message-----
From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 12:24 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Win2K DNS is PISSING ME OFF

No ISA. We have an access list with all the necessary ports open. The
DNS
servers have no problem communicating with root hints at the beginning.

-----Original Message-----
From: Thomas Di Nardo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 12:17 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Win2K DNS is PISSING ME OFF


Are you using ISA as a firewall?

-----Original Message-----
From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 12:16 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Win2K DNS is PISSING ME OFF

Hi all.

I have two Win2K AD DNS servers. Recently they have been acting up: all
of a
sudden one of them stops using root hints and can't resolve a lot of
good
domain names (request timed-out). I restart the DNS server service and
everything is OK again. Then 10-15 minutes later, it starts giving
request
timed-out. Both DNS servers experience this at different times.

Has anyone here seen this?

_________________________________________________________________
List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

_________________________________________________________________
List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

_________________________________________________________________
List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

_________________________________________________________________
List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

_________________________________________________________________
List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

_________________________________________________________________
List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to