The right answer does vary quite a bit and those who have done the work in
production environments to gather the stats are, in general not terribly
willing to give away that expertise without a consulting engagement.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Schwartz, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Friday, May 24, 2002 7:50 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Routing group bandwidth requirements
> 
> 
> I guess the point of it would be YMMV. Depending on your 
> traffic patterns, your need to regulate traffic between sites 
> by size and or times or to throttle the connection. With E2K 
> you put in your best guess and if it's not what you need, 
> it's not that hard to change it. We have two main data 
> centers with dual OC3's between them. I was going to have all 
> the servers in one great big routing group and if the network 
> folks whine about all the chatter, then I'll split them in two.
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Leo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Friday, May 24, 2002 1:39 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Routing group bandwidth requirements
> 
> 
> Exchange 2000 resource kit chapter 31 "Reliable always on 
> connectivity is more important that high bandwdth" this is 
> the only reference I could find.
> 
> There is also a white paper from MS but all it says is 
> "Generally, servers within a routing group are connected by a 
> high speed network"
> 
> I have seen the text in the E2k reskit repeated more times 
> than the whitepaper.
> 
> There must be some stats out there!?
> 
> Leo
> 
> > I find it very hard to believe there are no stats available as yet, 
> > surely there are enough installations out there for MS to put their 
> > hands up and give some detail.
> > 
> > Leo
> > 
> > > Just buttering you up so you'll buy me beer.
> > > 
> > > 
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: missy koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 12:55 PM
> > > To: Exchange Discussions
> > > Subject: Re: Routing group bandwidth requirements
> > > 
> > > 
> > > While I appreciate your confidence, this is actually me just 
> > > guessing. But since MS doesn't care to provide any hard 
> numbers, I 
> > > took a WAG at what I would do, were it my client's 
> environment I was 
> > > designing.
> > > 
> > > M
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "Andy David" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 12:47 PM
> > > Subject: RE: Routing group bandwidth requirements
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Im Missy's case, Im betting on real life experience.
> > > 
> > > 
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 12:45 PM
> > > To: Exchange Discussions
> > > Subject: RE: Routing group bandwidth requirements
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Based on what?  Gut feeling?  Or any actual stats?  The 
> only reason 
> > > I ask is that there's a distinct lack of any best 
> practice or stats 
> > > yet. My understanding is that, since SMTP is asynchronous, it can 
> > > still work in low bandwidth environments without the timeouts 
> > > associated with RPCs. So in theory, messages would just queue if 
> > > there's not enough bandwidth.
> > > 
> > > So the thinking then becomes that we only know how low we 
> can go if 
> > > we know what sort of traffic we're gonna get...
> > > 
> > > Neil
> > > 
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: missy koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Posted At: 23 
> > > May 2002 17:11 Posted To: Swynk Exchange List
> > > Conversation: Routing group bandwidth requirements
> > > Subject: Re: Routing group bandwidth requirements
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Well, it's more important that the bandwidth is highly available 
> > > than it is for the bandwidth to be, say 10 Mb.  But I'd say that 
> > > your low limit for connectivity would be somewhere around 
> 128 Kbps - 
> > > but would prefer to see 256 Kbps or better with an RG.
> > > 
> > > Missy
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "Leo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 5:55 AM
> > > Subject: Routing group bandwidth requirements
> > > 
> > > 
> > > What are the typical bandwidth requirements within a 
> routing group. 
> > > Are there any documented guidelines available?
> > > 
> > > Regards
> > > Leo
> > > 
> > > _________________________________________________________________
> > > List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> > > Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> > > To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > _________________________________________________________________
> > > List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> > > Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> > > To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > 
> > > *************************************************
> > > This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and 
> > > intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is 
> > > addressed. Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the
> > > author and do not necessarily represent those of
> > > Silversands, or any of its subsidiary companies.
> > > 
> > > If you have received this email in error, please
> > > contact our Support Desk immediately on
> > > 01202-360360 or email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > *************************************************
> > > 
> > > _________________________________________________________________
> > > List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> > > Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> > > To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > 
> > > 
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > ----
> > > ------
> > > The information contained in this email message is privileged and
> > > confidential information intended only for the use of the 
> individual or
> > > entity to whom it is addressed.  If the reader of this 
> message is not
> > > the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any 
> dissemination,
> > > distribution or copy of this message is strictly 
> prohibited.  If you
> > > have received this email in error, please immediately 
> notify Veronis
> > > Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax 
> (212)381-8168, or email
> > > ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message.  Thank you.
> > > 
> > > 
> ====================================================================
> > > ====
> > > ======
> > > 
> > > 
> > > _________________________________________________________________
> > > List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> > > Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> > > To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > _________________________________________________________________
> > > List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> > > Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> > > To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > 
> > >
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> --------------
> --
> > > The information contained in this email message is privileged and
> confidential information intended only for the use of the 
> individual or entity to whom it is addressed.  If the reader 
> of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby 
> notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this 
> message is strictly prohibited.  If you have received this 
> email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler 
> Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email
> ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message.  Thank you.
> > > 
> > >
> ==============================================================
> ==============
> ==
> 
> _________________________________________________________________
> List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> _________________________________________________________________
> List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 

_________________________________________________________________
List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to