Now, now, isn't that just a bit of an over-reaction? Let's just take a deep breath and think about...Microsoft Mail 3.5. I'll just leave that with you...
----- Original Message ----- From: "Hunter, Lori" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2002 12:49 PM Subject: RE: Trying to keep Exchange (et al) in our org > OfficeVision on the mainframe!!! > > -----Original Message----- > From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2002 2:48 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Trying to keep Exchange (et al) in our org > > > You might want to get your buyers club card from O'Reliy and Associates > (www.ora.com) and get familiar with *nix. > > You could always suggest that instead of running Notes, go all the way back > to Netscape mail server, or ISOCOR's X.400 mixer and mailbox server. > > John Matteson; Exchange Manager > Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards > (404) 239 - 2981 > > Defeat is a state of mind. No one is ever defeated until defeat has been > accepted as a reality. To me, defeat in anything is merely temporary, and > its punishment is but an urge for me to greater effort to achieve my goal. > Defeat simply tells me that something is wrong in my doing; it is a path > leading to success and truth. --Bruce Lee > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Smith Joseph [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2002 3:25 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Trying to keep Exchange (et al) in our org > > > All, > > Our corporate standards include an NT4 domain and Exchange 5.5 (and has for > several years now). We have 13 plants located in various countries around > the world. Our corporate HQ (located in Finland) has hired a new IS > director who has given us a directive that, in lieu of the anticipated > AD/Win2K/E2K rollout, we will be changing our backend infrastructure to > novell e-directory/lotus notes/linux servers! > > Now, I am as open-minded as the next guy about the prospect of padding my > resume with all sorts of new applications, but that seems a bit drastic. > Apparently, it all comes down to money. > > Besides, I love my E55sp4 server; it NEVER gives me any problems. > > Has anyone else experienced this? Which would be more painful short-term? > long-term?: the AD/Win2K/E2K or Novell/Lotus/Linux? I get the impression > that this is a knee-jerk reaction to Microsoft licensing costs. > > Any thoughts, experiences, or warnings concerning this migration would be > appreciated. > > Sincerely, > Joseph Smith > MCSE (NT4 + 2K), CCNA, Network+ > > Network Administrator > Perlos, Inc. > 5201 Alliance Gateway > Fort Worth, TX 76178-3729 > Work: 817-224-9012 > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _________________________________________________________________ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _________________________________________________________________ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _________________________________________________________________ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _________________________________________________________________ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
