I wouldn't characterize that advantage as a "performance benefit".

Creating two or more storage groups with that configuration could
actually reduce performance since the two would be competing for the
same log drive.

Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
Tech Consultant
hp Services
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!


-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Chris Scharff
Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2002 7:42 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: New Exchange 2000 Install


That's not entirely true I think. Even if all databases have the same
recoverability requirements there is potential savings of restoration
time in using multiple databases or storage groups if just one edb
fails. :) 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ken Cornetet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2002 9:36 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: New Exchange 2000 Install
> 
> With only one set of spindles for information store, there is no 
> performance benefit to be had from multiple storage groups or 
> databases.
> 
> If you have a set of mailboxes that have differing recoverability 
> requirements, you might consider making them a separate storage group.
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bob Chyka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2002 9:29 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Re: New Exchange 2000 Install
> 
> 
> thanks i already have that article printed out.  thanks for the info 
> ..and yes i am going to be running advanced server with exchange 
> enterprise...any insight on the breakdown of storage groups (how many 
> mailboxes per) etc.
> 
> thanks,
> 
> BOb C.
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Ken Cornetet" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2002 10:15 AM
> Subject: RE: New Exchange 2000 Install
> 
> 
> > I think you are on the right track. If you do anything different, 
> > add
> more
> > RAM.
> >
> > BTW, With 3GB you will need to use the boot.ini switch /3GB, which
> requires
> > windows 2000 advance server. Otherwise, your apps (Exchange) will 
> > only
> get
> > 2GB
> >
> > See http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;q266096 
> > for
> more
> > details.
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Bob Chyka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Monday, June 17, 2002 11:12 AM
> > To: Exchange Discussions
> > Subject: New Exchange 2000 Install
> >
> >
> > Hello everybody,
> >
> > just looking for a little guidance/insight on a new project im 
> > looking
> at
> > doing.  i have exchange 5.5 running at 3 different companies and 
> > understand how it works, etc.
> >
> > for the college that i work for, they want me to deploy a exchange 
> > 2000 server that will host 2000 mail accounts.  i just need some 
> > guidance of where i should go to design our server for this many 
> > users and how to
> set
> > up exchange.  i wanted to split the users onto a couple servers but
> money
> > doesnt allow this right now.
> >
> > this is the hardware i have to work with.  i have a dell 6400 with 
> > dual PIII 1.0ghz xeons with 2 megs of cache.  i have 3 gigs of ram 
> > and 7 hard drives to work with with a perc RAID controller.  i was 
> > going to
> configure
> > raid 1 for the OS and another RAID 1 set for the log files, then use

> > the last 3 drives in a raid 5 config for the databases.
> >
> > i have some whitepapers from microsoft on how to set up the server 
> > with that many users but they dont really get into details.  any 
> > help is greatly appreciated!
> >
> > thanks for your time,
> >
> > Bob C.
> >
> > _________________________________________________________________
> > List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> > Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> > To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > _________________________________________________________________
> > List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> > Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> > To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> 
> 
> _________________________________________________________________
> List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> _________________________________________________________________
> List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

_________________________________________________________________
List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]


_________________________________________________________________
List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to