If there's no $ cost to continuing AV scanning in MMS, one still might consider scanning at least the most risky file types with a secondary product. Course the maintenance $ on MMS simply for virus scanning would be just silly.
> -----Original Message----- > From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2002 1:17 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: IMC as SMTP internet gateway > > Good point. > I was thinking strictly in terms of AV, but if the gateway is applying > those > lovely disclaimers etc etc, then obviously the need for MMS may still > exist. > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2002 2:05 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: IMC as SMTP internet gateway > > > > couldn't you remove the need for > > the separate SMTP gateway solution? > > That depends entirely on what the SMTP gateway solution was doing. I don't > believe there's anywhere close to a 1 to 1 feature map between MMS and > Sybari's Antigen, so it would depend in large part on the functionality > desired from an SMTP gateway machine. _________________________________________________________________ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
