Set quotas and allow users to manage their mailboxes however they'd like within those quotas. For the most part you're over thinking the rest. It would be nice if users sent shortcuts to files located on network drives, but since I haven't had occasion to do that in 2+ years, I tend not to harp on the idea.
> -----Original Message----- > From: James Liddil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2002 7:10 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: One Folder (was Unlimited Quotas) > > OK now that that has been beaten to death, I now want to try and > understand > the aspects that effect performance (or perceived performance) for users. > So > the policy will be set at a certain large number for storage. Now will > exchange run better if users use folders or does it not matter and I > should > just let them use the inbox for everything? And along those same lines is > keeping all their attachments in exchange a bad thing from a performance > standpoint. Again I only want to consider this from the view point of > performance and what is "best" to keep exchange running well. If using > only > an inbox has a negative impact then and only then is it justified to spend > money for training on the use of folders. Never mind making folks more > productive (the one box vs. a well organized file cabinet). _________________________________________________________________ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
