E2k, however unchecking that doesn't change the tendency to do local delivery first. at least, my tests haven't shown it to. I will try again, though.
Thanks. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Greg Deckler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, August 08, 2002 5:07 PM Subject: Re: *: Help stopping local delivery > Exchange 5.5 or E2K? If E2K, when you configure the domain in the > recipient policy, uncheck the "This Exchange server is responsible..." > box. > > > Does anyone know how to preempt local delivery? > > If the server isn't authoratative for a domain I don't want it accepting > > local deliver if there happens to be an smtp address defined for one of the > > exchange user. > > If the exchange server is authoritative for exch.mydomain.com, then, fine, > > local delivery is ok. > > If user Joe has an exch.mydomain.com and has a second smtp address defined > > of [EMAIL PROTECTED], I want mail sent from user Fred on exch.mydomain.com to > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] to actually route off the exchange server to the authoritative > > server for joe.com (which is not the exchange server). Right now it does > > local delivery by default. Even specifying a smart host doesn not preempt > > this local delivery. > > > > ? Heelp pleeease... > > > > Wendy > > _________________________________________________________________ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > _________________________________________________________________ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
