Speaking of Austin streets... 

1409 Lavaca, Friday at 11:30?

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Wednesday, September 11, 2002 2:05 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Internal Exchange Name vs. external Internet Address/Name
> 
> 
> Messageware, not MessageOne, makes Outlook Plus Pak. 
> MessageOne, not Messageware, keeps Chris Scharff off the 
> streets of Austin.
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: David Wright [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Posted At: Wednesday, September 11, 2002 1:45 PM
> Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List
> Conversation: Internal Exchange Name vs. external Internet 
> Address/Name
> Subject: RE: Internal Exchange Name vs. external Internet Address/Name
> 
> 
> What is Outlook Plus Pak?  And where can you find it?
> 
> I checked www.messageone.com, and did not see any reference to it...
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dale Geoffrey Edwards [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 11, 2002 10:56 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Internal Exchange Name vs. external Internet Address/Name
> 
> 
> OWA2000 looks like a striped down version of the Outlook 
> client.  We have used it extensively in my office here, and 
> every likes the new interface and all the bells and whistles 
> that go along with it.  Of course, we added Outlook Plus Pak 
> for OWA2000 which is a great product from MessageOne (a 
> little plug for you, Chris!!).
> 
> Geoff.......
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: David Wright [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Wednesday, September 11, 2002 1:35 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Internal Exchange Name vs. external Internet Address/Name
> 
> 
> Our users have complained about OWA (5.5)...  Is OWA any 
> better (more user
> friendly) in Exchange 2000?
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 11, 2002 10:27 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Internal Exchange Name vs. external Internet Address/Name
> 
> 
> 2
> or use 
> OWA
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: David Wright [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Wednesday, September 11, 2002 1:24 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Internal Exchange Name vs. external Internet Address/Name
> 
> 
> Hi All,
> 
> Is there a way to have Outlook NOT rename the Exchange Server 
> after it resolved the server address?
> 
> Our situation:
> Internally, the server is named MAIL
> It can be reached via the web at TEST.company.com
> When we configure Outlook, we enter TEST.company.com and it 
> validates the user...  Then it changes the server name to MAIL.
> 
> Of course, Outlook will no longer work because the address 
> MAIL is not valid on the net.
> 
> We have 2 solutions, but we do not like either:
> 1) Add HOSTS table entry on remote machines (but then they fail
> internally)
> 2) Require VPN connection
> 
> Of course, had I foreseen this issue, I would have named the 
> Exchange server TEST.company.com to begin with (assuming that 
> is even possible).
> 
> Thanks for any ideas/insight,
> David
> 
> 
> _________________________________________________________________
> List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> ----------
> ----
> --
> The information contained in this email message is privileged 
> and confidential information intended only for the use of the 
> individual or entity to whom it is addressed.  If the reader 
> of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby 
> notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this 
> message is strictly prohibited.  If you have received this 
> email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler 
> Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email
> ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message.  Thank you.
> 
> ==============================================================
> ==========
> ====
> ==
> 
> 
> _________________________________________________________________
> List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> _________________________________________________________________
> List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> _________________________________________________________________
> List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> _________________________________________________________________
> List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> _________________________________________________________________
> List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 

_________________________________________________________________
List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to