Well isn't that "Special Undocumented Feature" a dandy!  I'm going to have
to fix a lot of mailbox privileges during my migration.  WONDERFUL!!!
Thanks for the help Mike!

___________________________
John Bowles
Exchange Administrator
Enterprise Support & Engineering
Celera Genomics
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 


-----Original Message-----
From: Hutchins, Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, September 11, 2002 3:38 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Permission Problems For Migrated Mailboxes


Well, afaik, all you need to do is add reviewer rights to the top of the
mailbox object itself and everything should work. It is one of those
"Special Undocumented Features" TM.

When you move a mailbox to an E2K server, it resets all the permissions on
the top level of the mailbox object to default == none, anonymous == none,
and consequently, the delegate doesn't have rights to see that they have
rights.. (?)

No idea why.. PSS told me after I called them..

-----Original Message-----
From: Seitz, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, September 11, 2002 1:13 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Permission Problems For Migrated Mailboxes


This is normal as we found out in our test lab.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 11, 2002 11:55 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Permission Problems For Migrated Mailboxes
> 
> 
> All,
> 
> I'm having a weird problem when migrating mailboxes from one Exchange 
> server to another.  I'm in mixed mode right now and it doesn't matter 
> if I move a
> mailbox between 5.5->E2K.  Or E2K-E2K.   But what seems to 
> happen is once
> the mailbox is moved admins who have been manually added to
> their bosses calendar for viewing lose their permissions to 
> view the calendar.  Once you re-add them it works fine.  Now 
> is there something I'm missing when moving mailboxes that 
> would prevent this from occuring?  I've heard that the 
> permissions should stay intact during a move.  But it doesn't 
> seem to be the case here.  I've had 2 occurences happen so 
> far one mailbox moving from 5.5->E2K and E2K->E2K.  Can 
> anyone shed any light on this?  
> 
> TIA,
> 
> ___________________________
> John Bowles
> Exchange Administrator
> Enterprise Support & Engineering
> Celera Genomics
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> _________________________________________________________________
> List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 

_________________________________________________________________
List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

_________________________________________________________________
List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

_________________________________________________________________
List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to