OK. Anonymous = yes with 2000, not needed with Exchange 5.5. Thanks!
Robert > -----Original Message----- > From: Kim Cameron [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, September 11, 2002 6:03 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Public Folder Chaos > > in e2k, you *do* have to set anonymous to contributor in order to get > external messages. Just another one of the Plethora of Sinister Surprises > that abound in e2k. > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Reiss, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Posted At: Wednesday, September 11, 2002 4:04 PM > Posted To: MS Exchange Forum > Conversation: Public Folder Chaos > Subject: RE: Public Folder Chaos > > > No, you don't need to give permissions to "Anonymous". I also had this > impression initially based on reading a Q article, but I think it had > "anonymous" confused with "default" (it was definitely inconsistent). > > Peter > > -----Original Message----- > From: McCready, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, September 11, 2002 3:57 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Public Folder Chaos > > > Somebody else said I should change Anonymous to Contributor to, > in order to accept messages from the Internet. But my test message > worked OK with anonymous still set to NONE. Is that how it should > work? Do I need to touch anonymous? > > _________________________________________________________________ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _________________________________________________________________ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
