An awesome garage band from Seattle. 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Etts, Russell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2002 11:33 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Message rejected
> 
> 
> Hi All
> 
> I know I'm opening myself up to getting flamed here, but I 
> have to ask....
> 
> What is "Friggin Lyris"?
> 
> Thanks
> 
> Russell
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2002 11:15 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Message rejected
> 
> 
> Friggin Lyris.
> 
> > I rarely tell anyone to shut their pie hole (Unless it's Andy
> > David). Instead you shoudl ask him to document his argument 
> > in detail so you can consider it. At the moment, his 
> > assertion is too vague to consider as valid or not.
> > 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Edwards, Aaron
> > To: Exchange Discussions
> > Sent: 9/25/2002 4:29 AM
> > Subject: ADC vs. Exmerge
> > 
> > Hi,
> >  
> > We have about a 850 mailboxes and a 10 GB Info Store that is
> > Exchange 5.5 SP4. We have seperate OWA 5.5 and IMS servers. 
> > We also run Antigen 6.5. We are planning on moving to 
> > Exchange 2000. We have a new server that we are going to 
> > migrate to. I have read the faqs and many white papers about 
> > migrating. From what I've read, the ADC is the recommended 
> > way to go to get your mailboxes, public folders, and settings 
> > moved over. However, one of our staff has brought up the 
> > argument that, in order to have a clean Exchange 2000 server, 
> > it is best to not use the ADC. He says that we should exmerge 
> > all our mailboxes, export our public folders to pst's, reset 
> > up our settings, and exmerge/import everything into the new 
> > server. Anyone have any thoughts on this? Should I just tell 
> > him to shut his pie hole?
> >  
> > Thanks,
> >  
> > Aaron
> > 
> > 
> > ______________________________________________________________
> > __________
> > 
> > This message and any attachments have been scanned for
> > viruses during transmission from Washington Trust Bank. 
> > ______________________________________________________________
> > __________
> > 
> > NOTICE:  This e-mail may contain confidential or privileged
> > material and is intended for use solely by the 
> > above-referenced recipient. Any review, copying, printing, 
> > disclosure, distribution, or other use by any other person or 
> > entity is strictly prohibited. If you are not the named 
> > recipient, or believe you have received this e-mail in error, 
> > please reply to the sender and delete the copy you received. 
> > Thank you. 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > _________________________________________________________________
> > List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> > Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> > To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > 
> 
> _________________________________________________________________
> List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> _________________________________________________________________
> List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 

_________________________________________________________________
List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to