We use Antigen, and one of the scan engines we use is NAI, the other being Sophos. Having used Groupshield in the past I would normally agree that it's best not to use NAI products, but I have to say that the NAI scan engine works really well within Antigen, better, in fact than it does in Groupshield. For one thing the automatic updates always work, and for another Sybari seems to enhance the dat files by adding in extra.dats that normal NAI users don't get.
One thing that's nice about the multiple scan engines, aside from the sheer number of engines, is that you also get some geographical distribution in the sources for your dat files. Since viruses can appear pretty much anywhere, this gives you a better chance that at least one of your scan engines will get an early critical update. -Peter -----Original Message----- From: Busby, Jacob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 08, 2002 8:24 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Antigen vs. Trend > and Norman and Kaperski are fairly small > shops, Kaperski's mailing list is pretty interesting. It's usualy worth getting your support id on several virus mailing lists so that you have some idea what's out there before it's reported on news.bbc.co.uk _________________________________________________________________ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ______________________________________________ This message is private or privileged. If you are not the person for whom this message is intended, please delete it and notify me immediately, and please do not copy or send this message to anyone else. _________________________________________________________________ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
