What were those mints called again?

-----Original Message-----
From: Martin Tuip [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 4:05 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: MEC 2002 comments?


I thought it were the mints that Tom gave us or the scrambled toasts ? ;)

--------------------------
Martin Tuip
MVP Exchange
Exchange2000 List owner
www.exchange-mail.org
www.sharepointserver.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------

----- Original Message -----
From: "Martin Blackstone" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 5:50 PM
Subject: RE: MEC 2002 comments?


> That's why we all had breakfast at the Marriot in the AM. Ham 
> Scrambles.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Chris H [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 7:58 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Re: MEC 2002 comments?
>
>
> I have been to several Tech Eds and the last MEC. Content-wise I 
> thought this one was great, especially with more 2000 experience under 
> everyone's belt and more to talk about and report on. It seemed they 
> skimped on all
the
> "extra's" that us geeks (or just me perhaps) like so much such as:
>
> -- Something HOT for breakfast (I kinda liked the different mexican 
> spin
you
> could put on breakfast each day in Dallas)
> -- A conference shirt I didnt have to jump through hoops for (and then
they
> ran out of them on Friday. This I paid $2K for????). And what happened 
> to Attendee Party shirts?? But I did get a stuffed Monkey after five 
> shots at that damned basketball hoop!! :)
> -- Classes (lectures?) that REPEAT as there were overlaps of good 
> content
in
> EVERY time slot. Repeat at off hours if you like for those of us
interested.
> -- Food still sucks but I realize it is hard to cook well for 6000 
> people.
> -- Attendee party blew compared to the last couple at Universal Studios
were
> you had access to the whole park and food from the park; not catered 
> crap.
I
> loved only getting to ride 4 different adult rides all night. Had I 
> paid
$99
> for my wife to go I would have been LIT!
> -- Wireless access still needs A LOT of work. You think they would 
> make it more pervasive and add more AP's. If youre going to do it and 
> Cisco is
going
> to be a sponsor, DO IT RIGHT. At the Cisco conferences the wireless is
rock
> solid and never fails.
>
> My 2 cents and of course I will be at Tech Ed next year for my 2 days 
> of abbreviated infrastructure content!
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Murray Alexander" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 3:20 AM
> Subject: MEC 2002 comments?
>
>
> > Hm. It's almost Tuesday, and nobody has posted anything on the above 
> > subject. So, whassamatta? There is NO way that I'm the first. That's 
> > so unlikely that I can't come up with a comparison.
> >
> > I was disappointed about two things. First, I got sick again, just 
> > like Dallas. I spent more time than I wanted figuring out when I was 
> > to take
my
> > next dose of patent medicine. It doesn't do much, but it's better 
> > than nothing. Second, I couldn't find a source to manufacture my 
> > latest Great Idea (tm). What was it? A button saying "Have you seen 
> > Missy?". I tell
ya,
> I
> > coulda sold a million of 'em...ahem, sorry.
> >
> > I did see Ed Woodrick, easily recognizable after meeting him in 
> > Boston
in
> > '98. Poor guy didn't have a clue who I was, but fought back bravely. 
> > Did
> not
> > see Ed Crowley, darn it all.
> >
> > For the record:
> > - the party was better than Dallas
> > - the party food was better than Dallas
> > - the party would've been a LOT better if the _whole_ park had been 
> > open
> > - the conference lunches would've been a LOT better without that damned
> > zucchini.
> > - the venue was a lot better than Boston
> >
> > BTW, ran into a Dallas native (hmm...is that a Dallas-ite? A 
> > Dallasian?)
> who
> > said that the Dallas Convention Centre had expanded, adding another
30,000
> > square feet (I think that's the number). Sounds like lots of room 
> > for
> TechEd
> > 2003!
> >
> >
> >
> > _________________________________________________________________
> > List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> > Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> > To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
>
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>


_________________________________________________________________
List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

_________________________________________________________________
List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to