'Goof' might be a bit too harsh... It's certainly a PITA and a change in behavior, but it's a deliberate one based on the architectural changes made (not being an apologist by any means, it certainly is frustrating). I believe that if, instead of setting global limits, you set them on a per user basis, you'll get the behavior you desire. Setting them on a per user basis, begs for programmatic creation of users... Another interesting kettle of fish.
> -----Original Message----- > From: Kretche, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, October 16, 2002 2:52 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Microsoft's goof making my life miserable > > > In the glory days of Exchange 5.5 there was a reg hack one > could do to limit the total number of recipients in a message > without having an adverse effect on Distribution Lists being > in the message. Now with Exchange 2000 and AD, every > recipient in a DL is counted towards the total recipient > count. This is quite troublesome when we have several large > distribution lists. Has anyone found a workaround to this or > is this something we have to live with? > > --------------------------------------------------------- > Thank you, > Pete Kretche > MCP, A+ > Network Systems Administrator > University of Wisconsin - Green Bay > (920) 465-5014 > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > _________________________________________________________________ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > _________________________________________________________________ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
