Agreed! The List party was one of the highlights, thanks Kim and Andy! I
enjoyed talking see all those people, talk to Ed and some others of you. 

IMO the best MEC has been that one in Nice/France in 2000, but this one in
Anaheim was much huger - such a big crowd of Exchange people.

I was wondering about meeting so much people from Denmark - in Kopenhagen
the European MEC will take place next month ...

After this it would be hard to ever attend an European MEC or TechEd or
whatever again. See you - hopefully - next year at the US TechEd. I'm not
fully convinced of the idea putting the MEC and the TechEd together, we will
see.

Regards to all of you

S�nke Luck

KPMG Germany
Exchange Messaging


-----Original Message-----
From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:jhblunt@;bhi-erc.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 11:12 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: MEC 2002 comments?


Let me say also that I probably enjoyed the List party most of all.  I got
to meet all of my heroes/heroines at one time.  Thanks folks for accepting
me as one of your own.

People I now count as friends: Andy David, Andy Webb (BTW...thanks again for
the hat), Darcy Adams, Martin Blackstone, Gary Slinger, Ed Crowley, Ed
Woodrich, Victor Fisher, Kevin Miller, Erik Sojka, Martin Tuip, Matt Cross,
Tom Meunier, Chris Scharff, Doug Hampshire, Seigfried Weber, et al.

Every single one of these people (regardless of their sometimes cynical
comments online) ;o), is truly a very sociable and fun person to be around.
I enjoyed meeting you all.  Thanks again and I'll see you next year or at
TechEd.

-----Original Message-----
From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:mwoodruff@;inchord.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 4:30 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: MEC 2002 comments?


It was alright I guess.  I got sick also?   I think food poisoning was
the culprit in my case. 

-----Original Message-----
From: Murray Alexander [mailto:malexander@;city.vancouver.bc.ca] 
Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 3:21 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: MEC 2002 comments?


Hm. It's almost Tuesday, and nobody has posted anything on the above
subject. So, whassamatta? There is NO way that I'm the first. That's so
unlikely that I can't come up with a comparison.

I was disappointed about two things. First, I got sick again, just like
Dallas. I spent more time than I wanted figuring out when I was to take my
next dose of patent medicine. It doesn't do much, but it's better than
nothing. Second, I couldn't find a source to manufacture my latest Great
Idea (tm). What was it? A button saying "Have you seen Missy?". I tell ya, I
coulda sold a million of 'em...ahem, sorry.

I did see Ed Woodrick, easily recognizable after meeting him in Boston in
'98. Poor guy didn't have a clue who I was, but fought back bravely. Did not
see Ed Crowley, darn it all.

For the record:
- the party was better than Dallas
- the party food was better than Dallas
- the party would've been a LOT better if the _whole_ park had been open
- the conference lunches would've been a LOT better without that damned
zucchini.
- the venue was a lot better than Boston

BTW, ran into a Dallas native (hmm...is that a Dallas-ite? A Dallasian?) who
said that the Dallas Convention Centre had expanded, adding another 30,000
square feet (I think that's the number). Sounds like lots of room for TechEd
2003!



_________________________________________________________________
List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe:         mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com
Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]


_________________________________________________________________
List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe:         mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com
Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

_________________________________________________________________
List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe:         mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com
Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]


--
Die Information in dieser eMail ist vertraulich und kann dem Berufsgeheimnis 
unterliegen. Sie ist ausschliesslich fuer den Adressaten bestimmt. Jeglicher Zugriff 
auf diese eMail durch andere Personen als den Adressaten ist untersagt. Sollten Sie 
nicht der fuer diese eMail bestimmte Adressat sein, ist Ihnen jede Veroeffentlichung, 
Vervielfaeltigung oder Weitergabe wie auch das Ergreifen oder Unterlassen von 
Massnahmen im Vertrauen auf erlangte Information untersagt. In dieser eMail enthaltene 
Meinungen oder Empfehlungen unterliegen den Bedingungen des jeweiligen 
Mandatsverhaeltnisses mit dem Adressaten.

The information in this email is confidential and may be legally privileged. It is 
intended solely for the addressee. Access to this email by anyone else is 
unauthorized. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, 
distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, is 
prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this email are 
subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing KPMG client engagement 
letter.


_________________________________________________________________
List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe:         mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com
Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to