Yes, this is purely for testing. There are separate vmware machines to handle the different functions, simulating the production machines. The particular virtual machine I'm having problems with is only running W2K as a member server.
Cathy Jackson. -----Original Message----- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:thlabse@;hotmail.com] Sent: 28 October 2002 18:17 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Exchange 5.5 on vmware server Is this for a test bed. Most times I see VMare is for testing not anything else. I have setup up Exchange 5.5 on Windows 2000 on a separate server as part of a network that had a VMware server handling all the DNS, DHCP and Domain controller functions. That worked fine. Sounds like too many things running causing memory, ports, etc. running for limited resources. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jackson, Cathy M" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 12:36 PM Subject: Exchange 5.5 on vmware server > Hi Everyone > > I'm trying to set up a test network using vmware on a Windows 2000 > server. I've set up 2 domain controllers and several other servers, but > am having problems setting up Exchange 5.5 on a Windows 2000 virtual machine (set up as a member server in the domain). > > The error I'm getting is as follows: > > While attending to stop the Microsoft Exchange System Attendant > service, the following error was encountered: the requested control is not > valid for this service. Microsoft Windows NT ID 0xc002041c > > This occurs after the files are copied to the virtual server (ie I've nearly got to the end of a normal install). After it's happened (I've > tried several times!), the Exchange services services are present but > not started (you can't start them manually). There's no entry in the > Control panel Add remove/software to enable easy removal to allow > another installation attempt, but I've tried manual removal of the > exchange registry entries without success. I've also tried on another virtual machine with a clean W2K installation with the same results. > The machines have 256M memory, and we're using the host-only > networking configuaration. The Microsoft KB simply says they don't support this > and the vmware support KB doesn't appear to have anything relevant. > > I seem to remember a couple of people on this list saying they used vmware, so how did you do it?! > > Cathy Jackson > Sheffield Hallam University, UK > > _________________________________________________________________ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com > Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > _________________________________________________________________ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _________________________________________________________________ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
