I've been trying to follow along; maybe this isn't the same thing I was
referring to.

Help me out here: when mail from outside (like this one) hits your org, what
path does it follow?

----- Original Message -----
From: "Ken Cornetet" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2002 9:19 AM
Subject: RE: Weird SMTP header problem


> But it happens with external mail as well.
>
> Our test systems have never shown this symptom.
>
> Our production E2K system never started doing this until last week (we
can't
> think of anything that's changed on any of the Exchange servers). It's
been
> running for a couple of months now.
>
> Like I've said earlier, this behavior stopped after rebooting the E2K
> mailbox server, but now it's back!
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2002 9:28 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Weird SMTP header problem
>
>
> I recall reporting this and escalating it when I still worked there. Was
> told it's by design when SMTP mail is transferred within an organization.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ken Cornetet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2002 8:20 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Weird SMTP header problem
>
>
> To summarize my problem, my E2K mailbox server is stripping SMTP
"Received:"
> headers, and "making up" it's own. Last week when this happened, a reboot
> cleared up the problem, but it came back (not been able to reboot again,
> yet).
>
> Ed, is this proof enough?
>
> I've managed to distill the problem down to a simple set of steps.
>
> 1. Send email from my PC to the MSX 5.5 IMS server using blat. Here's the
> output:
> Failed to open registry key for Blat profile , using default. Failed to
open
> registry key for Blat Sending x.kix to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Login name is
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] <<<getline<<< 220 nts126.kimball.com ESMTP Server
> (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service 5.5.2652.78) ready
> >>>putline>>> EHLO 051kcornet
> <<<getline<<< 250-nts126.kimball.com Hello [051KCORNET] 250-XEXCH50
250-HELP
> 250-ETRN 250-DSN 250-SIZE 0 250-AUTH LOGIN 250 AUTH=LOGIN
> >>>putline>>> MAIL From:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> <<<getline<<< 250 OK - mail from <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >>>putline>>> RCPT To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> <<<getline<<< 250 OK - Recipient <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >>>putline>>> DATA
> <<<getline<<< 354 Send data.  End with CRLF.CRLF
> <<<getline<<< 250 OK
> >>>putline>>> QUIT
> <<<getline<<< 221 closing connection
>
> 2. Here's NTS126's log entries from above message
>
> c=us;a= ;p=kii;l=NTS1260211191352XC17P83W 1012 2002.11.19 13:52:20
> /o=KII/ou=Jasper001/cn=Configuration/cn=Connections/cn=Internet Mail
> Connector (NTS126)
> /o=KII/ou=Jasper001/cn=Configuration/cn=Connections/cn=Internet Mail
> Connector (NTS126) XC17P83W [EMAIL PROTECTED] 0 1555
> 0 0 1
> c=us;a= ;p=kii;l=NTS1260211191352XC17P83W 1013 2002.11.19 13:52:20
> /o=KII/ou=Jasper001/cn=Configuration/cn=Connections/cn=Internet Mail
> Connector (NTS126)
> /o=KII/ou=Jasper001/cn=Configuration/cn=Servers/cn=NTS126/cn=Microsoft
> Private MDB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 0 1555 0 0 1
> C=us;A= ;P=kii;L=NTS1260211191352XC17P83W 0 2002.11.19 13:52:21
> /O=KII/OU=JASPER001/CN=CONFIGURATION/CN=CONNECTIONS/CN=INTERNET MAIL
> CONNECTOR (NTS126) C=US;A=
> ;P=KII;O=Jasper001;DDA:SMTP=fubar(a)kimball.com; 0 2159 0
> 0 1
> C=us;A= ;P=kii;L=NTS1260211191352XC17P83W 7 2002.11.19 13:52:21
> /O=KII/OU=JASPER001/CN=CONFIGURATION/CN=SERVERS/CN=NTS390/CN=MICROSOFT MTA
> C=US;A= ;P=KII;O=Jasper001;DDA:SMTP=fubar(a)kimball.com; 0 2159
> 0 0 1
>
> The most pertinent part of the logs is the event IDs: 1012 - SMTP
received,
> 1013 - SMTP transferred inbound, 0 - Message transferred in, and 7 -
message
> transferred out. Notice there is no 1010 or 1011 (outbound SMTP)
>
> Next, here's the tracking.log entries from the E2K mailbox server
>
> 11/19/2002 13:52:26 GMT - - - NTS390 -
> /O=KII/OU=JASPER001/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Kcornet 1027
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 0 0
> 1354 1 2002-11-19 13:52:26 GMT 0 - c=us;a=
> ;p=kii;l=NTS1260211191352XC17P83W Contents of file: x.kix
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
> 11/19/2002 13:52:26 GMT - - - NTS390 -
> /O=KII/OU=JASPER001/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Kcornet 1019
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 0 0
> 1354 1 2002-11-19 13:52:26 GMT 0 - - Contents of
> file: x.kix [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
> 11/19/2002 13:52:26 GMT - - - NTS390 -
> /O=KII/OU=JASPER001/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Kcornet 1025
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 0 0
> 1354 1 2002-11-19 13:52:26 GMT 0 - - Contents of
> file: x.kix [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
> 11/19/2002 13:52:26 GMT - - - NTS390 -
> /O=KII/OU=JASPER001/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Kcornet 1024
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 0 0
> 1354 1 2002-11-19 13:52:26 GMT 0 - - Contents of
> file: x.kix [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
> 11/19/2002 13:52:26 GMT - - - NTS390 -
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 1023
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 0 0
> 1354 1 2002-11-19 13:52:26 GMT 0 - - Contents of
> file: x.kix [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
> 11/19/2002 13:52:26 GMT - - - NTS390 -
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 1028
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 0 0
> 1354 1 2002-11-19 13:52:26 GMT 0 - - Contents of
> file: x.kix [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
>
> Lastly, here's what I see from outlook 2002:
>
> Microsoft Mail Internet Headers Version 2.0
> Received: by nts390.kii.kimball.com
> id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 19 Nov 2002
> 08:51:56 -0500
> content-class: urn:content-classes:message
> Subject: Contents of file: x.kix
> Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2002 08:51:56 -0500
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> Content-Type: application/ms-tnef;
> name="winmail.dat"
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: binary
> X-MS-Has-Attach:
> Thread-Topic: Contents of file: x.kix
> Thread-Index: AcKP0tNV5UfLpPvBEdaoJgCQJ4dN9Q==
> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.6249.0
> From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, November 18, 2002 4:48 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Weird SMTP header problem
>
>
> The only proof I would accept is a dump of the headers between each of the
> servers in your series of a message that's mysteroiously being stripped.
>
> Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
> Tech Consultant
> hp Services
> Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Ken Cornetet
> Sent: Monday, November 18, 2002 11:51 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Weird SMTP header problem
>
>
> Then I'm not sure what you mean.
>
> The only way SMTP gets into Kimball is via the checkpoint firewall, and it
> is configured to send only to nts126 (the MSX5.5 IMS server). There are no
> other hosts involved.
>
> The checkpoint participates only at the packet level, it does no native
SMTP
> conversation. It neither strips, nor adds headers.
>
> It can't be Cleanmail because their servers wouldn't know if the email was
> destined for an E2K mailbox or a MSX5.5 mailbox.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, November 18, 2002 2:27 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Weird SMTP header problem
>
>
> That doesn't prove it to me.
>
> Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
> Tech Consultant
> hp Services
> Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Ken Cornetet
> Sent: Monday, November 18, 2002 11:20 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Weird SMTP header problem
>
>
> No.
>
> 1. People who's mailboxes are still on MSX 5.5 servers do not see the
> problem.
>
> 2. A reboot of the E2K mailbox server clears the problem up (at least for
a
> while).
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, November 18, 2002 12:25 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Weird SMTP header problem
>
>
> I suspect this is a feature of one of your hosts outside Exchange.
>
> Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
> Tech Consultant
> hp Services
> Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Ken Cornetet
> Sent: Monday, November 18, 2002 7:24 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Weird SMTP header problem
>
>
> Our E2K mailbox servers have recently developed a bad habit...
>
> Many people here (myself included) create Outlook rules to move their
> Internet email into a separate folder based on the SMTP headers. A couple
of
> days ago this stopped working. An quick examination of an incoming
Internet
> email's headers showed that most all of the header information was gone,
and
> what was there is strange.
>
> Our email flow is this:
>
> 1. Internet to Cleanmail (floyd.cinergycom.net) (for virus scrubbing) 2.
> Cleanmail to our checkpoint firewall (kimbintinc-cp.kimball.com) 3.
> Checkpoint to nts126 (a NT4/MSX5.5 IMS connector) 4. nts126 to nts390 (E2K
> mailbox) via MTA
>
> Normally, Internet email "Received:" headers look like this (edited for
> brevity):
>
> Received: from kimbintinc-cp.kimball.com (igate.kimball.com
> [167.178.249.18]) by nts126.kimball.com ...
> Received: (6577 bytes) by floyd.cinergycom.net
> Received: by cleanmail.com ...
> Received: from csc222.csc.dg.com(xn82.emc.com[168.159.1.82]) (6103
> bytes) by floyd.cinergycom.net
>
> Notice that nts390 is NOT listed in the headers, since nts126 (an MSX5.5
IMS
> server) sends email to nts390 (E2K mailbox server) via MTA, not SMTP.
>
> However, recently, This is what I see when looking at headers:
>
> Microsoft Mail Internet Headers Version 2.0
> Received: by nts390.kii.kimball.com
> id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon, 18 Nov 2002
> 09:03:08 -0500
>
> There are several things wrong with this picture:
>
> 1. All of the preceding (timewise) "Received:" headers are gone.
> 2. Internet mail cannot be going directly to nts390, it must be going
> through nts126
> 3. The one "Received:" header does not show who the message was received
> from.
>
> A reboot of the E2K mailbox server fixes the problem for a while, then it
> mysteriously comes back.
>
> Any ideas?
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>



_________________________________________________________________
List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to