What exactly does he think would replicate less and why? I'd say it's not a good idea because it would be a significant amount of effort while it would achieve practically nothing.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Couch, Nate Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2002 4:13 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: E5.5 -> E2K migration question - Moving servers to new domains. One of the Admins in charge of migrating one of our customers over to E2K had a question regarding moving some existing E5.5 servers to new domains prior to migration over to E2K so as to minimize replication. I can't think of anything that would indicate this would be a problem, but I figured I would run this by the list to be sure. Scenario - Current environment - 4 E5.5 servers with SP4 (NT 4.x with SP6a) running in one domain (DOMAIN A let's call it). For the purposes of migration they want to move three servers into three existing domains. Each of these domains has a two way trust with DOMAIN A. In short what will happen is this. Currently in DOMAIN A SERVER A SERVER B SERVER C SERVER D After the move SERVER A DOMAIN A SERVER B DOMAIN B SERVER C DOMAIN C SERVER D DOMAIN D Can anyone suggest a reason why this would NOT be a good idea? Thanks. Nate Couch EDS Messaging _________________________________________________________________ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _________________________________________________________________ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
