I realize it is all a best guess.  What number does Exchange use to determine
if a person is over or near the "mailbox" size limit as set in System
Manager.  Is it the number I see in System Manager or some other number?

Jim

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dupler, Craig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Friday, November 22, 2002 12:42 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Size of mailbox
> 
> 
> Right.  Remember, none of the numbers can be valid because 
> there is no such thing as a physical mailbox.  They are 
> views, and as such, any size attributed to them is a 
> theoretical number obtained by summing a bunch of stuff.  
> Also, remember that notes and attachments associated with 
> calendar objects (i.e. appointments) get counted.  But I'll 
> bet lots of stuff doesn't like holidays and such, but hey, 
> that's a wild guess.  Also, if you stop and think about it, 
> the security attributes of any one object in Exchange have to 
> be almost infinitely extensible, to allow for all of the 
> changing view activity.  I suspect that those attributes are 
> constantly causing objects to change size, but that those 
> sizes don't get updated very often within a view.  
> 
> If you stop and think about it, if there are three people on 
> the same store, and A, sends B a note, and then B forwards it 
> to C, it should get a few bytes larger in A's view assuming 
> that it is still in Sent Items.  But I'll bet that step is 
> skipped, or massively deferred, which is going to make the 
> size data wrong for most items in most views most of the time.
> 
> People can have lots of stuff linked that way.  I've never 
> seen the exact formula for what gets added and what doesn't, 
> but I'll bet Sue knows, if you send her a note at Slipstick.  
> If she doesn't know, then no-one does.
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2002 8:44 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Size of mailbox
> 
> 
> Jim,
> 
> Regardless of the "the trend I see for all other users", I 
> would have a problem believing either set of numbers.  Here's why:
> 
> The first set of numbers (if that is actually kilobytes and 
> not bytes) would indicate that there SHOULD be a total of 
> ~336mb in the first mailbox. Obviously, there 
> isn't...according to your report.
> 
> The second set of numbers would indicate that there should be 
> a total of ~813mb in the second mailbox.  Again, the numbers 
> still don't add up.
> 
> The only way I can think of that your second set of numbers 
> would be accurate, is that you have some 3rd party piece of 
> software that actually saves all attachments off to a member 
> server and then stores a pointer with the message to the 
> actual location of the attachment, which is screwing up your 
> reports.  But look at your second set of numbers.  The TOTAL 
> for the entire mailbox is still smaller than just the 
> messages by themselves, without even adding in the attachment numbers.
> 
> I think I'd go back to square one or go back and look at the 
> configuration of your reporting software, in order to make 
> sure you don't have it grabbing data for the mailbox reports 
> that doesn't belong to the mailbox.
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: James Liddil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2002 7:35 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Size of mailbox
> 
> 
> That helps but I still have some questions.  I'll try to be 
> more clear.
> 
> When I look in the Exchange System Manager at an account does 
> or does that not give one at least a relatively true size for 
> that persons mailstore size?
> 
> Bindview tells me they simply use the numbers provided by 
> Exchange to get the report figures.  This report gave me a 
> mailstore number size equivalent to that I saw in the System 
> Manager.  (~3.4 meg this morning).
> 
> All my confusion stems from the following.  I run a report in 
> Bindview and the query terms have the following definition:
> 
> -Message Size: This field contains the size (in k) of the 
> Message, including attachments -Attachment Total Size: This 
> field lists the total size of all attachments
> (bytes) to the      message
> -Total Mailbox Size: This field contains the total size of 
> all messages (k).
> 
> So I get:
> 
> Message Size: 268356 k
> Attachment Total Size: 75998 k
> Total Mailbox size: 3341 k (this number matches what I see in System
> Manager)
> 
> For another person I get
> 
> Message Size: 429069
> Attachment Total Size: 403223 k
> Total Mailbox size: 425915 k
> 
> 
> What are some reasons for mine having such a difference 
> between message size and total mailbox size? The data for the 
> second person matches the trend I see for all other users.  
> What is the most reliable number?  And which number does 
> exchange use to determine what a person mailbox size is and 
> whether they are near or over limit?
> 
> 
> And why am I asking all this?  Our message store total is 
> close to 6 gigs for a company of 20 people.  So then I decide 
> to use Bindview to get a better breakdown of the store.  And 
> it appears that as with many orgs we have a lot of pack rats 
> with 80% (based on the bindview numbers) of their mailbox 
> space consisting of attachments.  I want to make sure that 
> these at least some what reflect the real world numbers. Are 
> there better tools to get a handle on the store?
> 
> Jim Liddil
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Dupler, Craig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2002 5:36 PM
> > To: Exchange Discussions
> > Subject: RE: Size of mailbox
> > 
> > 
> > Keep in mind that there is no such thing as a mailbox.  So, 
> in a very 
> > real sense, it consumes little if any space.  Ok, what is it.
> > 
> > The store or more accurately the two stores are two large combined 
> > storage environments.  One is used to manage inherently 
> private stuff 
> > (mailboxes) and the other is used to manage largely public stuff 
> > (public folders).  Thus the priv and pub.  You will often hear them 
> > referred to as "single instance stores or storage."  There 
> are several 
> > important ways to think about what is in them.
> > 
> > Everything is only in there once.  If there are two copies of 
> > something, then the second copy is either not in one of the 
> stores, or 
> > there are multiple servers and something has been replicated due to 
> > the requirements implied by the rights (more on this below).
> > 
> > A mailbox is a view of the contents of the two stores.  A 
> mailbox view 
> > includes the entire hierarchy of the pub store and only 
> those items in 
> > the priv store that are assigned to the security context 
> and "mailbox" 
> > that matches the user's current profile.  One item mail may 
> appear in 
> > every last view of every last valid profile, or it may 
> occur in only 
> > one.
> > That will depend on to whom it was sent, and how it was 
> > dispositioned in a particular view.  If someone deletes and 
> > item, all that does is remove it from their view.  It is not 
> > actually purged until it is deleted from all currently valid 
> > security contexts that have been linked into that store.
> > 
> > As you can imagine, a fair number of cycles in the server 
> are spent on 
> > internal processes that maintain the integrity of the store.  There 
> > are sweeping and garbage collection activities.
> > 
> > Obviously, the storage allocated to a mailbox view is at 
> best and on a 
> > good day, only a theoretical value.  It looks at the stored objects 
> > (including calendar items and journal entries) that can be 
> seen in in 
> > that view, and sums them.  Obviously, the sum of all views is many 
> > times greater than the total physical size of the two stores on the 
> > typical server.  But it is a convenient way of looking at the 
> > contents, and encouraging someone to delete stuff that they don't 
> > really need.  But equally obvious, if I send two people on the same
> > server as me a message and both of them delete it, but I keep 
> > a copy in my "Sent Items" folder, nothing has been deleted 
> > and the stores do not change size.  All that changed was the 
> > contents of the two recipient's views.
> > 
> > Does that help?
> > 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: James Liddil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2002 2:04 PM
> > To: Exchange Discussions
> > Subject: Size of mailbox
> > 
> > 
> > If look at my the storage size for my mail box it shows about 
> > 1,000,000 Bytes (~1000 KB.)Now just off hand this does not 
> look right. 
> > I then run report with Bindview for Exchange for the 
> attachment total 
> > and come up with ~74,000 KB which is larger than my total storage 
> > size.  If I look in Outlook I see 240,000 KB for my folder 
> size.  Can 
> > someone help me make sense of this?
> > 
> > Jim Liddil
> > 
> > _________________________________________________________________
> > List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> > Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> > To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > 
> > _________________________________________________________________
> > List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> > Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> > To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > 
> 
> _________________________________________________________________
> List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> _________________________________________________________________
> List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> _________________________________________________________________
> List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 

_________________________________________________________________
List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to