If money weren't an object, I'd likely be using CommVault at all of my customers sites. BE is a nice balance for the features and performance for a lot of shops though.
> -----Original Message----- > From: Steven Cox [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, December 03, 2002 9:33 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > > I think you'll find anti-BE sentiment is kinda rare around > these parts. I suppose you meant "just did *not* cut it" > which is surprising as its handling a 150+ server environment > here very well, and I can't recall the last time a fellow > sysadmin stated a dislike for the product. > > On the flipside, I'm showing my ignorance by noting that I'd > never heard of "commvault galaxy" and "spectra logic" until > now :) What features did you find compelling over BE? > > s > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Hansen, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Tuesday, December 03, 2002 10:20 AM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: Veritas Backup Exec Engine > > > > > > We updated allright, we tossed the product. For a 60 server site > > backup exec just did cut it. We run CommVault galaxy with > a spectra > > logic library now, easy living. > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Mustafa Ibrahim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Tuesday, December 03, 2002 5:58 AM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: Veritas Backup Exec Engine > > > > > > Sorry Hansen, but not according to my NT4 SP6a with Exchange > > 5.5/SP4 and > > Backup Exec 8.0. It is idle at 0% when no backup is running > with all > > services running as per normal. I personally don't see why an idle > > backup software engine should take up 50% of CPU usage when > in fact it > > isn't doing much at all. > > > > Perhaps you need an update fix from veritas. > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Hansen, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: 02 December 2002 20:17 > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: Veritas Backup Exec Engine > > > > > > Speaking from past experience, yes. > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Johnny Martinez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Monday, December 02, 2002 10:42 AM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: Veritas Backup Exec Engine > > > > Hi all, > > Is it normal for the bengine.exe to be taking 50% CPU usage when no > > backups are running? > > > > Johnny > > > > _________________________________________________________________ > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > _________________________________________________________________ > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > _________________________________________________________________ > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > _________________________________________________________________ > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > _________________________________________________________________ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > _________________________________________________________________ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
