Spamkillers seem to be spammers. I invite you to google them and look at the results....
Dale L. Orr Information Systems Security Specialist State Department http://infoassurance.irm.state.gov (202)203-5066 This e-mail is unclassified based on the definitions provided in E.O. 12958 Subject: RE: Kill spammers DEAD! From: "Friese, Casey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Thu, 2 Jan 2003 10:03:38 -0500 X-Message-Number: 8 It looks like people are using it... I just sent a message there to see what happens and here's the ndr that I got The following recipient(s) could not be reached: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 1/2/2003 10:01 AM The message could not be delivered because the recipient's mailbox is full. < mxsmta02.inithost.com #4.2.2> -----Original Message----- From: Freddie Soerensen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]=20 Sent: Thursday, January 02, 2003 9:52 AM To: Exchange Discussions Cc: Hostmaster Subject: Kill spammers DEAD! Hi list, Does anybody know if these people are serious : http://www.spamkillers.net/ Thanks Freddie _________________________________________________________________ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Subject: RE: Kill spammers DEAD! From: "Drewery, Anthony" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Thu, 2 Jan 2003 15:05:31 -0000 X-Message-Number: 9 I'd be a little wary. By submitting your spam to them you could just be giving them live email addresses to sell on. Ant. -----Original Message----- From: Freddie Soerensen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 02 January 2003 14:52 To: Exchange Discussions Cc: Hostmaster Subject: Kill spammers DEAD! Hi list, Does anybody know if these people are serious : http://www.spamkillers.net/ Thanks Freddie _________________________________________________________________ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] "This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. This communication represents the originator's personal views and opinions, which do not necessarily reflect those of CP Ships. If you are not the intended recipient, be advised that you have received this email in error and that any use, dissemination, forwarding, printing or copying of this email is strictly prohibited. If you received this email in error, please contact the CP Ships Helpdesk at +44 (0) 1293 582 800. Further, we make every effort to keep our network free from viruses. However, you do need to check this email and any attachments to it for viruses as we can take no responsibility for any computer virus which might be transferred by way of this email." ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Subject: Re: HP Digital Sender LDAP Connection From: "Murray Alexander" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Thu, 2 Jan 2003 09:07:29 -0800 X-Message-Number: 10 If memory serves, you have to import a bunch of stuff into your Active Directory: new objects and things to support the HP unit. It may have even gone as far as modifying your schema (can't be sure on that). When we realized what was involved, we backed off in a hurry. That's mostly due to lack of confidence (our AD setup was quite new at the time), and a lack of any defined business need. All agreed that "it would be nice to have", but then agreed that affecting the entire organization to benefit one department was a risk we didn't need to take. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Woodruff, Michael" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, January 02, 2003 5:08 AM Subject: HP Digital Sender LDAP Connection > Has anyone used an HP 9100C Digital Sender connected to Active Directory > before? I cannot get the darn thing to work. I have all all the > parameters correct, but get "No matching entries found" when I do a > search. I have the correct port (389), the correct IP of the GC server, > and the search root is set to (DC=domain,DC=com). If anyone has any > insight on this, I would gladly pay you Tuesday for a hamburger today. > Thanks. > > > > > _________________________________________________________________ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Subject: RE: Kill spammers DEAD! From: "Drew Nicholson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Thu, 2 Jan 2003 11:11:26 -0600 X-Message-Number: 11 Forwarding email chainletters is the same as spam? Not likely... Drew Nicholson Technical Writer Network Engineer LAN Manager RapidApp 312-372-7188 (work) 312-543-0008 (cell) Born To Edit -----Original Message----- From: Freddie Soerensen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]=20 Sent: Thursday, January 02, 2003 8:52 AM To: Exchange Discussions Cc: Hostmaster Subject: Kill spammers DEAD! Hi list, Does anybody know if these people are serious : http://www.spamkillers.net/ Thanks Freddie _________________________________________________________________ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Subject: FW: CONFERENCE ROOMS From: "Reed, Alexander" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Thu, 2 Jan 2003 13:49:59 -0500 X-Message-Number: 12 I am new to this list and I hope to gain more knowledge about Exchange Server. So to begin, I have a problem with our conference rooms. We current have a mailbox setup called "Resource Proxy" that is the "owner" of all of the conference rooms. When someone schedules a conference room, the resource proxy determines if the room is available (by seeing if "it" has a meeting scheduled for that time) and auto excepts if there is not conflict. There are some major drawbacks of resource scheduling in this manner including some conflicts we have seen in the past. I have looked into new methods to auto resource scheduling in the past, and I would like you to resolve this. I assume there is a more efficient way to script the automatic scheduling of conference rooms or do this in Exchange. I appreciate any help! Thanks, Alex ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Subject: IIS/OWA failing? From: "Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Thu, 2 Jan 2003 14:00:20 -0500 X-Message-Number: 13 Exchange 5.5 SP4 NT 4.0 and 2000. We've been having problems with our Outlook Web Access and IIS failing. I have 3 systems now that are periodically failing. One is running NT 4.0 sp6a, and I can stop/restart the services and users still cannot get in. I have to reboot to get OWA to start and accept queries again. I do get an event 115 stating the service could not bind instance 1. The data is the error code message. On two other systems with Windows 2000 SP3 and fully patched, the IIS just stops for no apparent reason and the IIS Admin Service restarts IIS using the iisreset.exe. I kind of recall someone stating that there may be a security patch that may have induced some problems to IIS/OWA? I also have the CDO patch q289606 installed and I also have McAfee excluding all Exchange directories as well as the c:\winnt\system32\inetsrv directories on the systems. Pete Pfefferkorn Senior Systems Engineer/Mail Administrator University of Cincinnati 51 Goodman Street Cincinnati, OH 45221 Phone - (513) 556-9076 Fax - (513) 556-2042 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Subject: http From: "Jon Hill" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Thu, 2 Jan 2003 14:00:41 -0500 X-Message-Number: 14 I recently resolved a performance problem by stopping and restarting the = http cluster resource on our E2K cluster. I've been trying to figure = out ever since why http would affect the server's performance. Around 9:15a users started complaining that e-mail "seemed slow." I = confirmed that messages were sitting in the Outbox for up to four = minutes, and that other tasks like opening large folders and deleting = messages were taking much longer than expected. After checking the = usual suspects (nothing of note in the event log; cpu utilization was = around 20%; comm between the cluster nodes was fine), I went into ESM = and saw that the SMTP local delivery queue was holding between 20 and 40 = messages. I traced a test message to myself and saw that it took five = minutes to travel through the queue. It's rare for our queue to exceed = 1, so that confirmed to me that something was wrong. =20 After about an hour of fruitless snooping around, I sent a firmwide = e-mail and tried stopping and restarting the SMTP cluster resource. = That took forever (well, about 10 min) but when it was done the queue = remained high. Next I tried the MTA cluster resource, but again, no = luck. Then I restarted the HTTP cluster resource and the queue emptied = out almost instantly. Users also immediately reported better = performance. I know E2K works closely with IIS (ExIPC, e.g.) but IIS and HTTP are = obviously not the identical, so I'm unsure why restarting HTTP would = have such a dramatic effect. I've checked my E2K books, as well as technet and winnetmag.com, but = http exchange 2000 is not exactly a narrow query. Any thoughts? =20 E2K SP3 on W2K SP2. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Subject: Re: http From: "John W. Luther" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Thu, 02 Jan 2003 13:15:47 -0600 X-Message-Number: 15 Look at your Domain Controllers. We had a similar problem. We moved to Exchange as part of a University System-wide change. Our DCs were given to us preconfigured. After months of slow mail processing, and consulting with mSoft, we looked more closely at out DCs. They were woefully under powered and had far too little RAM. Upgrading the domain controllers, esp. the Global Catalogs, to dual processors with >= Gig of Ram eliminated most of the delays. It's worth a look, at least. Good luck. John At 02:00 PM 1/2/2003 -0500, Jon Hill wrote: >I recently resolved a performance problem by stopping and restarting the http cluster resource on our E2K cluster. I've been trying to figure out ever since why http would affect the server's performance. > >Around 9:15a users started complaining that e-mail "seemed slow." I confirmed that messages were sitting in the Outbox for up to four minutes, and that other tasks like opening large folders and deleting messages were taking much longer than expected. After checking the usual suspects (nothing of note in the event log; cpu utilization was around 20%; comm between the cluster nodes was fine), I went into ESM and saw that the SMTP local delivery queue was holding between 20 and 40 messages. I traced a test message to myself and saw that it took five minutes to travel through the queue. It's rare for our queue to exceed 1, so that confirmed to me that something was wrong. > >After about an hour of fruitless snooping around, I sent a firmwide e-mail and tried stopping and restarting the SMTP cluster resource. That took forever (well, about 10 min) but when it was done the queue remained high. Next I tried the MTA cluster resource, but again, no luck. Then I restarted the HTTP cluster resource and the queue emptied out almost instantly. Users also immediately reported better performance. > >I know E2K works closely with IIS (ExIPC, e.g.) but IIS and HTTP are obviously not the identical, so I'm unsure why restarting HTTP would have such a dramatic effect. > >I've checked my E2K books, as well as technet and winnetmag.com, but http exchange 2000 is not exactly a narrow query. Any thoughts? > >E2K SP3 on W2K SP2. > >_________________________________________________________________ >List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm >Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp >To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Subject: RE: CONFERENCE ROOMS From: "Couch, Nate" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Thu, 2 Jan 2003 13:17:05 -0600 X-Message-Number: 16 Try the Auto Accept wizard script from Robert Strong's website (http://www.exchangecode.com). I don't think he has an Exchange 2000 version yet but then you didn't mention which version of Exchange you are running. Nate Couch EDS Messaging > ---------- > From: Reed, Alexander > Reply To: Exchange Discussions > Sent: Thursday, January 2, 2003 12:49 > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: FW: CONFERENCE ROOMS > > I am new to this list and I hope to gain more knowledge about Exchange > Server. So to begin, I have a problem with our conference rooms. > > We current have a mailbox setup called "Resource Proxy" that is the > "owner" > of all of the conference rooms. When someone schedules a conference room, > the resource proxy determines if the room is available (by seeing if "it" > has a meeting scheduled for that time) and auto excepts if there is not > conflict. > > There are some major drawbacks of resource scheduling in this manner > including some conflicts we have seen in the past. > I have looked into new methods to auto resource scheduling in the past, > and > I would like you to resolve this. I assume there is a more efficient way > to > script the automatic scheduling of conference rooms or do this in > Exchange. > > I appreciate any help! > > Thanks, > Alex > > _________________________________________________________________ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Subject: RE: CONFERENCE ROOMS From: "Reed, Alexander" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Thu, 2 Jan 2003 14:19:37 -0500 X-Message-Number: 17 Exchange 5.5 sp3. I will look into this. Thanks to all that helped. -----Original Message----- From: Couch, Nate [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 02, 2003 2:17 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: CONFERENCE ROOMS Try the Auto Accept wizard script from Robert Strong's website (http://www.exchangecode.com). I don't think he has an Exchange 2000 version yet but then you didn't mention which version of Exchange you are running. Nate Couch EDS Messaging > ---------- > From: Reed, Alexander > Reply To: Exchange Discussions > Sent: Thursday, January 2, 2003 12:49 > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: FW: CONFERENCE ROOMS > > I am new to this list and I hope to gain more knowledge about Exchange > Server. So to begin, I have a problem with our conference rooms. > > We current have a mailbox setup called "Resource Proxy" that is the > "owner" of all of the conference rooms. When someone schedules a > conference room, the resource proxy determines if the room is > available (by seeing if "it" has a meeting scheduled for that time) > and auto excepts if there is not conflict. > > There are some major drawbacks of resource scheduling in this manner > including some conflicts we have seen in the past. I have looked into > new methods to auto resource scheduling in the past, and > I would like you to resolve this. I assume there is a more efficient way > to > script the automatic scheduling of conference rooms or do this in > Exchange. > > I appreciate any help! > > Thanks, > Alex > > _________________________________________________________________ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _________________________________________________________________ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Subject: Re: IIS/OWA failing? From: "Tony Hlabse" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Thu, 2 Jan 2003 14:27:07 -0500 X-Message-Number: 18 ----- Original Message ----- From: "Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, January 02, 2003 2:00 PM Subject: IIS/OWA failing? > Exchange 5.5 SP4 NT 4.0 and 2000. > > We've been having problems with our Outlook Web Access and IIS failing. I > have 3 systems now that are periodically failing. One is running NT 4.0 > sp6a, and I can stop/restart the services and users still cannot get in. I > have to reboot to get OWA to start and accept queries again. I do get an > event 115 stating the service could not bind instance 1. The data is the > error code message. > > On two other systems with Windows 2000 SP3 and fully patched, the IIS just > stops for no apparent reason and the IIS Admin Service restarts IIS using > the iisreset.exe. I kind of recall someone stating that there may be a > security patch that may have induced some problems to IIS/OWA? > > I also have the CDO patch q289606 installed and I also have McAfee excluding > all Exchange directories as well as the c:\winnt\system32\inetsrv > directories on the systems. > > Pete Pfefferkorn > Senior Systems Engineer/Mail Administrator > University of Cincinnati > 51 Goodman Street > Cincinnati, OH 45221 > Phone - (513) 556-9076 > Fax - (513) 556-2042 > > > _________________________________________________________________ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Subject: Re: IIS/OWA failing? From: "Tony Hlabse" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Thu, 2 Jan 2003 14:31:22 -0500 X-Message-Number: 19 I ran across this about 4 years ago. The solution was to uninstall OWA, reinstall OWA, then re apply the SP. Not sure if this would work for you but OWA on 5.5 sometimes would act strangely for no reason and this is what a call to MS did back then. I do remember after upgrading the hardware it went away, but that also included a complete rebuild of the server too. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, January 02, 2003 2:00 PM Subject: IIS/OWA failing? > Exchange 5.5 SP4 NT 4.0 and 2000. > > We've been having problems with our Outlook Web Access and IIS failing. I > have 3 systems now that are periodically failing. One is running NT 4.0 > sp6a, and I can stop/restart the services and users still cannot get in. I > have to reboot to get OWA to start and accept queries again. I do get an > event 115 stating the service could not bind instance 1. The data is the > error code message. > > On two other systems with Windows 2000 SP3 and fully patched, the IIS just > stops for no apparent reason and the IIS Admin Service restarts IIS using > the iisreset.exe. I kind of recall someone stating that there may be a > security patch that may have induced some problems to IIS/OWA? > > I also have the CDO patch q289606 installed and I also have McAfee excluding > all Exchange directories as well as the c:\winnt\system32\inetsrv > directories on the systems. > > Pete Pfefferkorn > Senior Systems Engineer/Mail Administrator > University of Cincinnati > 51 Goodman Street > Cincinnati, OH 45221 > Phone - (513) 556-9076 > Fax - (513) 556-2042 > > > _________________________________________________________________ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Subject: RE: IIS/OWA failing? From: "Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Thu, 2 Jan 2003 14:38:49 -0500 X-Message-Number: 20 Actually, I just rebuilt a new 2000 server and it also experienced the problem. Just brought it on-line a couple of days ago with 2000 SP3. -----Original Message----- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 02, 2003 2:31 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: IIS/OWA failing? I ran across this about 4 years ago. The solution was to uninstall OWA, reinstall OWA, then re apply the SP. Not sure if this would work for you but OWA on 5.5 sometimes would act strangely for no reason and this is what a call to MS did back then. I do remember after upgrading the hardware it went away, but that also included a complete rebuild of the server too. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, January 02, 2003 2:00 PM Subject: IIS/OWA failing? > Exchange 5.5 SP4 NT 4.0 and 2000. > > We've been having problems with our Outlook Web Access and IIS failing. I > have 3 systems now that are periodically failing. One is running NT 4.0 > sp6a, and I can stop/restart the services and users still cannot get in. I > have to reboot to get OWA to start and accept queries again. I do get an > event 115 stating the service could not bind instance 1. The data is the > error code message. > > On two other systems with Windows 2000 SP3 and fully patched, the IIS just > stops for no apparent reason and the IIS Admin Service restarts IIS using > the iisreset.exe. I kind of recall someone stating that there may be a > security patch that may have induced some problems to IIS/OWA? > > I also have the CDO patch q289606 installed and I also have McAfee excluding > all Exchange directories as well as the c:\winnt\system32\inetsrv > directories on the systems. > > Pete Pfefferkorn > Senior Systems Engineer/Mail Administrator > University of Cincinnati > 51 Goodman Street > Cincinnati, OH 45221 > Phone - (513) 556-9076 > Fax - (513) 556-2042 > > > _________________________________________________________________ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > _________________________________________________________________ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Subject: RE: http From: "Jon Hill" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Thu, 2 Jan 2003 14:40:54 -0500 X-Message-Number: 21 Our DCs should be able to handle Exchange (three DCs with dual 1.24GHz = and 1GB RAM for <300 users). This was a one-time problem. We hardly = ever have performance problems like this. =20 Thanks for the info. -----Original Message----- From: John W. Luther [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 02, 2003 2:16 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: http Look at your Domain Controllers. We had a similar problem. We moved to = Exchange as part of a University System-wide change. Our DCs were given = to us preconfigured. After months of slow mail processing, and = consulting with mSoft, we looked more closely at out DCs. They were = woefully under powered and had far too little RAM. Upgrading the domain = controllers, esp. the Global Catalogs, to dual processors with >=3D Gig = of Ram eliminated most of the delays.=20 It's worth a look, at least. Good luck.=20 John ... ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Subject: Re: http From: "Tony Hlabse" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Thu, 2 Jan 2003 14:47:25 -0500 X-Message-Number: 22 Are you saying that you have Exchange running on your DC/GC machines? If so not a good idea unless it is a very small environment. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jon Hill" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, January 02, 2003 2:40 PM Subject: RE: http Our DCs should be able to handle Exchange (three DCs with dual 1.24GHz and 1GB RAM for <300 users). This was a one-time problem. We hardly ever have performance problems like this. Thanks for the info. -----Original Message----- From: John W. Luther [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 02, 2003 2:16 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: http Look at your Domain Controllers. We had a similar problem. We moved to Exchange as part of a University System-wide change. Our DCs were given to us preconfigured. After months of slow mail processing, and consulting with mSoft, we looked more closely at out DCs. They were woefully under powered and had far too little RAM. Upgrading the domain controllers, esp. the Global Catalogs, to dual processors with >= Gig of Ram eliminated most of the delays. It's worth a look, at least. Good luck. John ... _________________________________________________________________ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Subject: RE: http From: "John W. Luther" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Thu, 02 Jan 2003 13:47:31 -0600 X-Message-Number: 23 OK. Cool. They do look quite up to the task. At 02:40 PM 1/2/2003 -0500, Jon Hill wrote: >Our DCs should be able to handle Exchange (three DCs with dual 1.24GHz and 1GB RAM for <300 users). This was a one-time problem. We hardly ever have performance problems like this. > >Thanks for the info. > >-----Original Message----- >From: John W. Luther [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >Sent: Thursday, January 02, 2003 2:16 PM >To: Exchange Discussions >Subject: Re: http > > >Look at your Domain Controllers. We had a similar problem. We moved to Exchange as part of a University System-wide change. Our DCs were given to us preconfigured. After months of slow mail processing, and consulting with mSoft, we looked more closely at out DCs. They were woefully under powered and had far too little RAM. Upgrading the domain controllers, esp. the Global Catalogs, to dual processors with >= Gig of Ram eliminated most of the delays. > >It's worth a look, at least. Good luck. > >John >... > >_________________________________________________________________ >List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm >Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp >To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Subject: RE: HP Digital Sender LDAP Connection From: "Jon Hill" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Thu, 2 Jan 2003 14:53:03 -0500 X-Message-Number: 24 I finally gave up after about a month of troubleshooting (this was about = eight months ago). Check out HP's forums. I remember finding some very = helpful tidbits in there when I was trying to get this to work. = http://forums.itrc.hp.com. Do a search for 9100C LDAP and hit the = checkmarks for the forums. -----Original Message----- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 02, 2003 8:09 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: HP Digital Sender LDAP Connection Has anyone used an HP 9100C Digital Sender connected to Active Directory before? I cannot get the darn thing to work. I have all all the parameters correct, but get "No matching entries found" when I do a search. I have the correct port (389), the correct IP of the GC server, and the search root is set to (DC=3Ddomain,DC=3Dcom). If anyone has any insight on this, I would gladly pay you Tuesday for a hamburger today. Thanks. =20 =20 _________________________________________________________________ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Subject: RE: CONFERENCE ROOMS From: "Tom Meunier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Thu, 2 Jan 2003 14:10:04 -0600 X-Message-Number: 25 For Exchange 2000: http://autoaccept-sink.sourceforge.net/ -----Original Message----- From: Couch, Nate [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Thursday, January 02, 2003 1:17 PM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: CONFERENCE ROOMS Subject: RE: CONFERENCE ROOMS Try the Auto Accept wizard script from Robert Strong's website (http://www.exchangecode.com). I don't think he has an Exchange 2000 version yet but then you didn't mention which version of Exchange you are running. Nate Couch EDS Messaging > ---------- > From: Reed, Alexander > Reply To: Exchange Discussions > Sent: Thursday, January 2, 2003 12:49 > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: FW: CONFERENCE ROOMS >=20 > I am new to this list and I hope to gain more knowledge about Exchange > Server. So to begin, I have a problem with our conference rooms. >=20 > We current have a mailbox setup called "Resource Proxy" that is the > "owner" > of all of the conference rooms. When someone schedules a conference = room, > the resource proxy determines if the room is available (by seeing if = "it" > has a meeting scheduled for that time) and auto excepts if there is = not > conflict. >=20 > There are some major drawbacks of resource scheduling in this manner > including some conflicts we have seen in the past. > I have looked into new methods to auto resource scheduling in the = past, > and > I would like you to resolve this. I assume there is a more efficient = way > to > script the automatic scheduling of conference rooms or do this in > Exchange. >=20 > I appreciate any help! >=20 > Thanks, > Alex >=20 > _________________________________________________________________ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >=20 >=20 _________________________________________________________________ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Subject: RE: SSL and OWA From: "Blunt, James H (Jim)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Thu, 2 Jan 2003 12:13:38 -0800 X-Message-Number: 26 Mike, I don't see anything on the site about a $100 refund. Am I blind or have they removed the refund, maybe as of 01/01/2003? -----Original Message----- From: Mike Newell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 31, 2002 8:27 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SSL and OWA Quality SSL. The Cert is actually provided by Baltimore Technologies. Trusted by 99% of web browsers and $125.00 for a year with a refund of $100.00. Here's the link. http://www.qualityssl.com/en/home.html -----Original Message----- From: Dave Vantine [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 31, 2002 4:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SSL and OWA The best I have come across is about $100 which is why I have generated my own certs for my 3 exposed servers. Who provides them at $25? -----Original Message----- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 30, 2002 4:23 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SSL and OWA That's what I did. That's a dirt cheap price. -----Original Message----- From: Mike Newell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 30, 2002 1:20 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SSL and OWA That's what I was going to do but a cert from quality ssl is trusted by 99% of all browsers for $25.00 a year. I figured why not. -----Original Message----- From: Public Folder: Exchange [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 30, 2002 1:08 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SSL and OWA Don't buy a SSL Cert. Just windows 2000 cert services to create your own. The only difference is that the user's browser will nag them about the cert, but they just have to answer yes and it works fine. -Kevin > -----Original Message----- > From: Mike Newell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Posted At: Monday, December 30, 2002 11:14 AM > Posted To: Exchange > Conversation: SSL and OWA > Subject: SSL and OWA > > > Hello, > I'm in the process of buying a certificate to secure an Outlook web > access page and part of the process is entering a site name. This site > has no dns site name, it's accessed via a link on our company web page > that's hosted by our ISP. > > Should I assign a dns name for this server or should I put in the > netbios name of the server? > > I'm just looking for some suggestions as this is the first server I'm > securing with SSL. > > Thanks again, > Mike. > > _________________________________________________________________ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > _________________________________________________________________ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _________________________________________________________________ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _________________________________________________________________ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _________________________________________________________________ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _________________________________________________________________ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Subject: Web interface to update Exchange 200/AD From: Byron Kennedy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Thu, 2 Jan 2003 12:31:03 -0800 X-Message-Number: 27 Is there a product out there that will allow you to update Exchange 2000/Active Directory data from a web interface. Ideally allowing you to let a Office Admin/Receptionist do this type of update. I recall hearing something about this years back w/ 5.5. Thx for any help. Byron Kennedy Senior Network Engineer MarketTools, Inc. 1 Belvedere Place Mill Valley, CA 94941 Phone: 415.462.2006 Fax: 954.827.2736 [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.markettools.com MarketTools(r) Real Market Research Insights. In Real Time. At Real Savings. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Subject: Re: Web interface to update Exchange 200/AD From: "Tony Hlabse" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Thu, 2 Jan 2003 15:35:58 -0500 X-Message-Number: 28 Try asking www.hyena.com about their product. On the surface it doesn't show Web Access but sure a call to their support group might help. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Byron Kennedy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, January 02, 2003 3:31 PM Subject: Web interface to update Exchange 200/AD > Is there a product out there that will allow you to update Exchange > 2000/Active Directory data from a web interface. Ideally allowing you to > let a Office Admin/Receptionist do this type of update. I recall hearing > something about this years back w/ 5.5. > > Thx for any help. > > Byron Kennedy > Senior Network Engineer > > MarketTools, Inc. > 1 Belvedere Place > Mill Valley, CA 94941 > Phone: 415.462.2006 > Fax: 954.827.2736 > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://www.markettools.com > > MarketTools(r) > Real Market Research Insights. In Real Time. At Real Savings. > > > _________________________________________________________________ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Subject: RE: Web interface to update Exchange 200/AD From: "William Lefkovics" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Thu, 2 Jan 2003 12:45:48 -0800 X-Message-Number: 29 There are a few web-based admin tools out there, such as: http://www.clear.net.nz/documentation/envision/o2000-webadmin.html Or did you mean galmod32 from the resource kit? William -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Byron Kennedy Sent: Thursday, January 02, 2003 12:31 PM To: Exchange Discussions Is there a product out there that will allow you to update Exchange 2000/Active Directory data from a web interface. Ideally allowing you to let a Office Admin/Receptionist do this type of update. I recall hearing something about this years back w/ 5.5. Thx for any help. Byron Kennedy Senior Network Engineer MarketTools, Inc. 1 Belvedere Place Mill Valley, CA 94941 Phone: 415.462.2006 Fax: 954.827.2736 [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.markettools.com MarketTools(r) Real Market Research Insights. In Real Time. At Real Savings. _________________________________________________________________ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Subject: RE: SSL and OWA From: Mike Newell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Thu, 2 Jan 2003 13:24:54 -0800 X-Message-Number: 30 Hello, I didn't see it on their site any more either so I emailed their sales dept and they ended the rebate at the end of the year. $125.00 is still not a bad priced compared to some others. -----Original Message----- From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 02, 2003 12:14 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SSL and OWA Mike, I don't see anything on the site about a $100 refund. Am I blind or have they removed the refund, maybe as of 01/01/2003? -----Original Message----- From: Mike Newell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 31, 2002 8:27 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SSL and OWA Quality SSL. The Cert is actually provided by Baltimore Technologies. Trusted by 99% of web browsers and $125.00 for a year with a refund of $100.00. Here's the link. http://www.qualityssl.com/en/home.html -----Original Message----- From: Dave Vantine [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 31, 2002 4:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SSL and OWA The best I have come across is about $100 which is why I have generated my own certs for my 3 exposed servers. Who provides them at $25? -----Original Message----- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 30, 2002 4:23 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SSL and OWA That's what I did. That's a dirt cheap price. -----Original Message----- From: Mike Newell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 30, 2002 1:20 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SSL and OWA That's what I was going to do but a cert from quality ssl is trusted by 99% of all browsers for $25.00 a year. I figured why not. -----Original Message----- From: Public Folder: Exchange [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 30, 2002 1:08 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SSL and OWA Don't buy a SSL Cert. Just windows 2000 cert services to create your own. The only difference is that the user's browser will nag them about the cert, but they just have to answer yes and it works fine. -Kevin > -----Original Message----- > From: Mike Newell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Posted At: Monday, December 30, 2002 11:14 AM > Posted To: Exchange > Conversation: SSL and OWA > Subject: SSL and OWA > > > Hello, > I'm in the process of buying a certificate to secure an Outlook web > access page and part of the process is entering a site name. This site > has no dns site name, it's accessed via a link on our company web page > that's hosted by our ISP. > > Should I assign a dns name for this server or should I put in the > netbios name of the server? > > I'm just looking for some suggestions as this is the first server I'm > securing with SSL. > > Thanks again, > Mike. > > _________________________________________________________________ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > _________________________________________________________________ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _________________________________________________________________ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _________________________________________________________________ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _________________________________________________________________ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _________________________________________________________________ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _________________________________________________________________ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Subject: RE: Web interface to update Exchange 200/AD From: Byron Kennedy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Thu, 2 Jan 2003 13:47:54 -0800 X-Message-Number: 31 Hey William- I'm looking for a tool (web preferably) that we could setup to let a junior staff/or office admin use to update the Active Directory contact info, etc. Could clear nets tool be used on our internal exchange infrastructure? Other products? Appreciate any advise. byron -----Original Message----- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 02, 2003 12:46 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Web interface to update Exchange 200/AD There are a few web-based admin tools out there, such as: http://www.clear.net.nz/documentation/envision/o2000-webadmin.html Or did you mean galmod32 from the resource kit? William -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Byron Kennedy Sent: Thursday, January 02, 2003 12:31 PM To: Exchange Discussions Is there a product out there that will allow you to update Exchange 2000/Active Directory data from a web interface. Ideally allowing you to let a Office Admin/Receptionist do this type of update. I recall hearing something about this years back w/ 5.5. Thx for any help. Byron Kennedy Senior Network Engineer MarketTools, Inc. 1 Belvedere Place Mill Valley, CA 94941 Phone: 415.462.2006 Fax: 954.827.2736 [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.markettools.com MarketTools(r) Real Market Research Insights. In Real Time. At Real Savings. _________________________________________________________________ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _________________________________________________________________ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Subject: RE: http From: "Jon Hill" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Thu, 2 Jan 2003 16:56:30 -0500 X-Message-Number: 32 Yikes, no. We have an E2K active/passive cluster where the passive node = is located in a DR site (the nodes are fooled into thinking they share a = hard drive). We have two DCs in the main office (one's also a GC) that = serve about 250 users and we have one DC/GC in a secondary (not DR) = office that serves about 20 users. Exchange is only configured to use = the local DC and DC/GC. The remote DC/GC is used primarily for logins = (it's got some other stuff on it but nothing related to Exchange). I should have said that my DCs can handle the traffic sent their way by = the Exchange server. Plus I may have oversnipped. My original post = questioned why stopping & restarting the HTTP cluster resource resolved = a performance problem that had been going on for a bit more than an = hour. -----Original Message----- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 02, 2003 2:47 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: http Are you saying that you have Exchange running on your DC/GC machines? If = so not a good idea unless it is a very small environment. ----- Original Message -----=20 From: "Jon Hill" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, January 02, 2003 2:40 PM Subject: RE: http Our DCs should be able to handle Exchange (three DCs with dual 1.24GHz = and 1GB RAM for <300 users). This was a one-time problem. We hardly ever = have performance problems like this. Thanks for the info. -----Original Message----- From: John W. Luther [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 02, 2003 2:16 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: http Look at your Domain Controllers. We had a similar problem. We moved to Exchange as part of a University System-wide change. Our DCs were given = to us preconfigured. After months of slow mail processing, and consulting = with mSoft, we looked more closely at out DCs. They were woefully under = powered and had far too little RAM. Upgrading the domain controllers, esp. the Global Catalogs, to dual processors with >=3D Gig of Ram eliminated most = of the delays. It's worth a look, at least. Good luck. John ... ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Subject: Messages stuck in the Queues From: "Jeffery Caudill" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Thu, 2 Jan 2003 16:55:57 -0500 X-Message-Number: 33 When messages come in the are stuck in the "Messages awaiting directory = lookup" Queue and will not get delivered to the correct mailbox. I have = research and researched and cannot come up with a fix any help would be = great. Thank=20 Jeff ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Subject: RE: Web interface to update Exchange 200/AD From: "William Lefkovics" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Thu, 2 Jan 2003 14:11:35 -0800 X-Message-Number: 34 I don't know if the tool fits all your needs. There are a few web-based ones. If the only purpose is to allow a Jr Admin to work on a subset of properties, I'd still probably train on and use the native tools (AD Users and Computers). Here are a few more that have web-based functionality, but they offer a lot more: Web Admin Tool http://www.microsoft.com/serviceproviders/downloads/webadmin_overview.as p Aelita Enterprise Directory Manager http://www.aelita.com/products/EDM4.htm NetIQ's Windows, SQL and Exchange Management products http://www.netiq.com/solutions/windows/default.asp William -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Byron Kennedy Sent: Thursday, January 02, 2003 1:48 PM To: Exchange Discussions Hey William- I'm looking for a tool (web preferably) that we could setup to let a junior staff/or office admin use to update the Active Directory contact info, etc. Could clear nets tool be used on our internal exchange infrastructure? Other products? Appreciate any advise. byron -----Original Message----- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 02, 2003 12:46 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Web interface to update Exchange 200/AD There are a few web-based admin tools out there, such as: http://www.clear.net.nz/documentation/envision/o2000-webadmin.html Or did you mean galmod32 from the resource kit? William -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Byron Kennedy Sent: Thursday, January 02, 2003 12:31 PM To: Exchange Discussions Is there a product out there that will allow you to update Exchange 2000/Active Directory data from a web interface. Ideally allowing you to let a Office Admin/Receptionist do this type of update. I recall hearing something about this years back w/ 5.5. Thx for any help. Byron Kennedy Senior Network Engineer MarketTools, Inc. 1 Belvedere Place Mill Valley, CA 94941 Phone: 415.462.2006 Fax: 954.827.2736 [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.markettools.com MarketTools(r) Real Market Research Insights. In Real Time. At Real Savings. _________________________________________________________________ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _________________________________________________________________ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _________________________________________________________________ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Subject: RE: SSL and OWA From: "Blunt, James H (Jim)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Thu, 2 Jan 2003 14:20:15 -0800 X-Message-Number: 35 Ok...Thanks. Jim Blunt -----Original Message----- From: Mike Newell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 02, 2003 1:25 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SSL and OWA Hello, I didn't see it on their site any more either so I emailed their sales dept and they ended the rebate at the end of the year. $125.00 is still not a bad priced compared to some others. -----Original Message----- From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 02, 2003 12:14 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SSL and OWA Mike, I don't see anything on the site about a $100 refund. Am I blind or have they removed the refund, maybe as of 01/01/2003? -----Original Message----- From: Mike Newell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 31, 2002 8:27 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SSL and OWA Quality SSL. The Cert is actually provided by Baltimore Technologies. Trusted by 99% of web browsers and $125.00 for a year with a refund of $100.00. Here's the link. http://www.qualityssl.com/en/home.html -----Original Message----- From: Dave Vantine [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 31, 2002 4:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SSL and OWA The best I have come across is about $100 which is why I have generated my own certs for my 3 exposed servers. Who provides them at $25? -----Original Message----- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 30, 2002 4:23 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SSL and OWA That's what I did. That's a dirt cheap price. -----Original Message----- From: Mike Newell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 30, 2002 1:20 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SSL and OWA That's what I was going to do but a cert from quality ssl is trusted by 99% of all browsers for $25.00 a year. I figured why not. -----Original Message----- From: Public Folder: Exchange [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 30, 2002 1:08 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SSL and OWA Don't buy a SSL Cert. Just windows 2000 cert services to create your own. The only difference is that the user's browser will nag them about the cert, but they just have to answer yes and it works fine. -Kevin > -----Original Message----- > From: Mike Newell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Posted At: Monday, December 30, 2002 11:14 AM > Posted To: Exchange > Conversation: SSL and OWA > Subject: SSL and OWA > > > Hello, > I'm in the process of buying a certificate to secure an Outlook web > access page and part of the process is entering a site name. This site > has no dns site name, it's accessed via a link on our company web page > that's hosted by our ISP. > > Should I assign a dns name for this server or should I put in the > netbios name of the server? > > I'm just looking for some suggestions as this is the first server I'm > securing with SSL. > > Thanks again, > Mike. > > _________________________________________________________________ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > _________________________________________________________________ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _________________________________________________________________ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _________________________________________________________________ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _________________________________________________________________ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _________________________________________________________________ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _________________________________________________________________ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _________________________________________________________________ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Subject: Re: Forwarding mailbox contents From: "Nikki Peterson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Thu, 2 Jan 2003 14:26:44 -0800 X-Message-Number: 36 Couldn't you use the OST2PST tool. Copy the OST to your own spot. Run the tool. Open the PST anywhere. Nikki -----Original Message----- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 01, 2003 12:13 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Forwarding mailbox contents While the answer is factually accurate, I believe it fails to answer the question asked. On 1/1/03 6:29, "Carlos Magalhaes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > If you using MS exchange then you can open the mail box go to the delivery > tab then go to the forward options and specify an address to forward the > e-mail to you can specify send a copy to both the mail box and the external > mail box or just the external mailbox. > > > > Regards, > > Carlos Magalhaes > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Boynton, Todd [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, December 30, 2002 6:47 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Forwarding mailbox contents > > > > Is there a way for an administrator to forward the entire contents of a > > mailbox to an external address without having to login to the mailbox. > > The mailbox contains old messages that contain sensitive information. > > > > Thanks > > > > Todd Boynton [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > ============================================ > > == Communications Specialist > > == UNET Technology Services, Network Operations > > == Maine School and Library Network > > == University of Maine System > > ============================================ > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Subject: Re: Recurring Calendar Error From: "Nikki Peterson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Thu, 2 Jan 2003 14:34:22 -0800 X-Message-Number: 37 http://autoaccept-sink.sourceforge.net/ The AutoAccept Sink for Exchange is a tool for Exchange 2000 that allows resource mailboxes to automatically accept/decline meeting requests based on a combination of factors. These factors include the free/busy status of the resource, whether the requestor is authorized, and many other configurable settings. Tom Munier just posted this on a related issue... Nikki -----Original Message----- From: Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 31, 2002 6:23 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Recurring Calendar Error Yeah, but since it's not available to the rest of us yet, that's not really an option, is it? Any word of a release date? -----Original Message----- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 31, 2002 6:47 PM To: Exchange Maillist Subject: Re: Recurring Calendar Error I'm a big fan of the Exchange Resource Manager for E2K. On 12/31/02 14:45, "Nikki Peterson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I have used the AutoAccept script for several years now and without a doubt it is the preferred way to go. Very easy to admin. Nikki -----Original Message----- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 31, 2002 12:38 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Recurring Calendar Error Public folders don't have free/busy data. On 12/31/02 13:22, "Bowles, John L." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: What about just removing them as accounts and mailboxes all together and just make it a calendar item as a public folder? They'd still have the same functionality correct? ______________________________ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support & Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] -----Original Message----- From: James Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 31, 2002 2:10 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Recurring Calendar Error Get the outlook autoaccept script from www.exchangecode.com and lose the accounts for the resource mailboxes. Follow the instructions for setting the permissions correctly for the mailboxes and you will not have any problems in setting up recurring meeting requests. Just make sure that the users are inviting the conference room as a resource and not a mandatory or optional attendee. James Winzenz, MCSE, A+ Associate Systems Administrator InovisTM, formerly Harbinger and Extricity -----Original Message----- From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 31, 2002 1:11 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Recurring Calendar Error Nikki, Let me take a look. I haven't logged in under that account in quite some time. I'll let you know. Thanks, ______________________________ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support & Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] -----Original Message----- From: Nikki Peterson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 31, 2002 1:06 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Recurring Calendar Error Wild guess here, the client acting as a resource, has the Outlook options set to AUTOMATICALLY DECLINE RECURRING MEETING REQUESTS? Look in calendar options for resources. Nikki > Bowles, John L. [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > All, > > What we have our 2 user accounts setup as conference rooms. (Don't > ask me why I just inherited this) and a user is trying to book a > recurring meeting appointment to this account but keeps returning the > error of: The "Conference Room" declined your meeting because it's > recurring. You must book each meeting separately with this resource. > > Does anyone have any idea why I can't book a recurring meeting? The > user who is trying to do this has Full Access to this mailbox. > > TIA, > > ______________________________ > John Bowles > Exchange Administrator > Enterprise Support & Engineering > Celera Genomics > [EMAIL PROTECTED]=20 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Subject: Re: HP Digital Sender LDAP Connection From: "Chris H" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Thu, 2 Jan 2003 18:30:29 -0500 X-Message-Number: 38 in an Exchange 5.5 no AD environment we just point ours at an Exchange server that has LDAP enabled on the default port. Have you tried that or does an Exchange 2000 server not keep its own copy of a directory since it is AD-enabled? I am not sure there . . . Chris ----- Original Message ----- From: "Murray Alexander" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, January 02, 2003 12:07 PM Subject: Re: HP Digital Sender LDAP Connection > If memory serves, you have to import a bunch of stuff into your Active > Directory: new objects and things to support the HP unit. It may have even > gone as far as modifying your schema (can't be sure on that). > > When we realized what was involved, we backed off in a hurry. That's mostly > due to lack of confidence (our AD setup was quite new at the time), and a > lack of any defined business need. All agreed that "it would be nice to > have", but then agreed that affecting the entire organization to benefit one > department was a risk we didn't need to take. > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Woodruff, Michael" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Thursday, January 02, 2003 5:08 AM > Subject: HP Digital Sender LDAP Connection > > > > Has anyone used an HP 9100C Digital Sender connected to Active Directory > > before? I cannot get the darn thing to work. I have all all the > > parameters correct, but get "No matching entries found" when I do a > > search. I have the correct port (389), the correct IP of the GC server, > > and the search root is set to (DC=domain,DC=com). If anyone has any > > insight on this, I would gladly pay you Tuesday for a hamburger today. > > Thanks. > > > > > > > > > > _________________________________________________________________ > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > _________________________________________________________________ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Subject: Forest prep question. From: Mike Newell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Thu, 2 Jan 2003 15:48:35 -0800 X-Message-Number: 39 Hello, I am running forestprep on a test domain and I am wondering when to use the new site or join an existing site. I have an exchange 5.5 server in place that I am doing an in place upgrade on to E2K so I already have an existing site but this site is not in the Active Directory. I'm not sure if it's asking if I want to create a new site in AD or if I want to create a new Exchange Org and site. Sorry if this sounds lame but this is the first time running forestprep and I want to make sure I get it right. Thanks, Mike. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Subject: Re: Forwarding mailbox contents From: Chris Scharff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Thu, 2 Jan 2003 17:54:07 -0600 X-Message-Number: 40 I didn't know there was an OST involved. On 1/2/03 16:26, "Nikki Peterson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Couldn't you use the OST2PST tool. Copy the OST to your own spot. Run the tool. Open the PST anywhere. Nikki -----Original Message----- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 01, 2003 12:13 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Forwarding mailbox contents While the answer is factually accurate, I believe it fails to answer the question asked. On 1/1/03 6:29, "Carlos Magalhaes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > If you using MS exchange then you can open the mail box go to the delivery > tab then go to the forward options and specify an address to forward the > e-mail to you can specify send a copy to both the mail box and the external > mail box or just the external mailbox. > > > > Regards, > > Carlos Magalhaes > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Boynton, Todd [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, December 30, 2002 6:47 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Forwarding mailbox contents > > > > Is there a way for an administrator to forward the entire contents of a > > mailbox to an external address without having to login to the mailbox. > > The mailbox contains old messages that contain sensitive information. > > > > Thanks > > > > Todd Boynton [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > ============================================ > > == Communications Specialist > > == UNET Technology Services, Network Operations > > == Maine School and Library Network > > == University of Maine System > > ============================================ > > _________________________________________________________________ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Subject: Re: Forest prep question. From: "Tony Hlabse" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Thu, 2 Jan 2003 18:55:45 -0500 X-Message-Number: 41 Create new. As you said this is a Test. By your question I would read and understand all the pitfalls before under taking an in-place upgrade. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Mike Newell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, January 02, 2003 6:48 PM Subject: Forest prep question. > Hello, > I am running forestprep on a test domain and I am wondering when to use the > new site or join an existing site. I have an exchange 5.5 server in place > that I am doing an in place upgrade on to E2K so I already have an existing > site but this site is not in the Active Directory. I'm not sure if it's > asking if I want to create a new site in AD or if I want to create a new > Exchange Org and site. > > Sorry if this sounds lame but this is the first time running forestprep and > I want to make sure I get it right. > > Thanks, > Mike. > > _________________________________________________________________ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Subject: Re: Forest prep question. From: Chris Scharff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Thu, 2 Jan 2003 17:55:38 -0600 X-Message-Number: 42 Do you have an ADC in place yet? On 1/2/03 17:48, "Mike Newell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hello, I am running forestprep on a test domain and I am wondering when to use the new site or join an existing site. I have an exchange 5.5 server in place that I am doing an in place upgrade on to E2K so I already have an existing site but this site is not in the Active Directory. I'm not sure if it's asking if I want to create a new site in AD or if I want to create a new Exchange Org and site. Sorry if this sounds lame but this is the first time running forestprep and I want to make sure I get it right. Thanks, Mike. _________________________________________________________________ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Subject: Re: Forwarding mailbox contents From: "Nikki Peterson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Thu, 2 Jan 2003 16:02:05 -0800 X-Message-Number: 43 If there is... then... :) -----Original Message----- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 02, 2003 4:54 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Forwarding mailbox contents I didn't know there was an OST involved. On 1/2/03 16:26, "Nikki Peterson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Couldn't you use the OST2PST tool. Copy the OST to your own spot. Run the tool. Open the PST anywhere. Nikki -----Original Message----- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 01, 2003 12:13 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Forwarding mailbox contents While the answer is factually accurate, I believe it fails to answer the question asked. On 1/1/03 6:29, "Carlos Magalhaes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > If you using MS exchange then you can open the mail box go to the delivery > tab then go to the forward options and specify an address to forward the > e-mail to you can specify send a copy to both the mail box and the external > mail box or just the external mailbox. > > > > Regards, > > Carlos Magalhaes > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Boynton, Todd [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, December 30, 2002 6:47 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Forwarding mailbox contents > > > > Is there a way for an administrator to forward the entire contents of a > > mailbox to an external address without having to login to the mailbox. > > The mailbox contains old messages that contain sensitive information. > > > > Thanks > > > > Todd Boynton [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > ============================================ > > == Communications Specialist > > == UNET Technology Services, Network Operations > > == Maine School and Library Network > > == University of Maine System > > ============================================ > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Subject: RE: Forest prep question. From: Mike Newell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Thu, 2 Jan 2003 16:02:47 -0800 X-Message-Number: 44 Yes, a two way connection is setup and seems to be working. -----Original Message----- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 02, 2003 3:56 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Forest prep question. Do you have an ADC in place yet? On 1/2/03 17:48, "Mike Newell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hello, I am running forestprep on a test domain and I am wondering when to use the new site or join an existing site. I have an exchange 5.5 server in place that I am doing an in place upgrade on to E2K so I already have an existing site but this site is not in the Active Directory. I'm not sure if it's asking if I want to create a new site in AD or if I want to create a new Exchange Org and site. Sorry if this sounds lame but this is the first time running forestprep and I want to make sure I get it right. Thanks, Mike. _________________________________________________________________ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _________________________________________________________________ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Subject: Internet Email Blackhole From: "Brown, Mark" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Fri, 3 Jan 2003 16:54:44 +1100 X-Message-Number: 45 We have 1 Exchange Organisation. 5 Sites. In Site1 we have Exchange and Exchange1. I successfully moved all recipients, connectors, public folders etc from Exchange to Exchange1, including an Internet Mail Service. I made sure that mail was being sent from and received by Exchange1's IMS and the IMS on Exchange was idle. I stopped all the services on Exchange and left it like that for a few days. No problems, no lost email. On Monday morning I deleted Exchange from the Organisation. Since then all email from Site1 sent to the internet has disappeared without a trace, no bounce back, no errors in the error log. Using Message Tracking I can see that the messages have been submitted to the store, but haven't gone to the IMS. The IMS is still successfully receiving email. Other sites with their own IMS' have had no problems, and I can track their messages from Submitted to the store and getting to the IMS. I have temporarily enabled Site2 to send Internet email from the rest of the organisation, to get around this problem, but I don't particular want our Frame Relay link being hit by all the internet traffic from Site1. Any ideas? I'm guessing I should have deleted the IMS on Exchange before deleting it from the Organisation? Is there anyway I can fix this and get the emails that have been sent. Given I have a workaround at the moment I'm not stressing too much, although we have a number of disgruntled users that have to go through their sent items and forward sent emails to people that haven't received them. I'll be contacting PSS on Monday if no-one is able to suggest a solution. Thanks Mark Brown ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Subject: Migration From: "Giardina, dhr. N.(ICTS)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Fri, 3 Jan 2003 07:08:38 +0100 X-Message-Number: 46 Hi Guys ! Does anyone out there knows how to migrate server side malboxs attributes like inbox and agenda permissions, from exchange 5.5 on one forest ( actually running NT4 BDC) to exchange 2000 on another forest ? Also, can I "disaster recover" exchange 5.5 running on NT4 server BDC to a Windows 2000 member server on another forest( domain) provided that the users have been migrated using ADMT tool ? any suggestion is grately appreciated Regards ------ Nico Giardina --- END OF DIGEST ------ You are subscribed as [EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe send a blank email to %%email.unsub%% _________________________________________________________________ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
