Just a side question. The last time I used a Digital Sender it was in a
NT4.0/Exchange 5.5 environment. The only thing that was tricky was making
sure the IP address of the unit was allowed to relay so a scanned image
could be emailed. Has something changed with the newer units and when in a
WIN2000/E2K setup? Just curious.

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Ken Cornetet" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, January 03, 2003 12:28 PM
Subject: RE: HP Digital Sender LDAP Connection


> By default, AD allows anonymous reads of AD info, but not searches.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, January 03, 2003 7:25 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: HP Digital Sender LDAP Connection
>
>
> I had all of that correct.  It turns out I need the dn of an account
> that has read access to AD (which I thought was default for anyone).  I
> originally put an account in, but not the accounts dn.  Now that it is
> in, voila, it works.  Thank for your replies.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, January 03, 2003 6:44 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: HP Digital Sender LDAP Connection
>
>
> Correct - E2k no longer has an integrated directory, as it uses AD.
> Optimally, you'd point LDAP clients at a GC server, although I believe
> any DC would work.
>
> ------------------------------------------------------
> Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
> Sr. Systems Administrator
> Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity
> Atlanta, GA
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Chris H [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Thursday, January 02, 2003 6:30 PM
> > To: Exchange Discussions
> > Subject: Re: HP Digital Sender LDAP Connection
> >
> >
> > in an Exchange 5.5 no AD environment we just point ours at an Exchange
>
> > server that has LDAP enabled on the default port. Have you tried that
> > or does an Exchange 2000 server not keep its own copy of a
> > directory since it
> > is AD-enabled? I am not sure there . . .
> >
> > Chris
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Murray Alexander" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Sent: Thursday, January 02, 2003 12:07 PM
> > Subject: Re: HP Digital Sender LDAP Connection
> >
> >
> > > If memory serves, you have to import a bunch of stuff into
> > your Active
> > > Directory: new objects and things to support the HP unit.
> > It may have even
> > > gone as far as modifying your schema (can't be sure on that).
> > >
> > > When we realized what was involved, we backed off in a hurry. That's
> > mostly
> > > due to lack of confidence (our AD setup was quite new at
> > the time), and a
> > > lack of any defined business need. All agreed that "it
> > would be nice to
> > > have", but then agreed that affecting the entire
> > organization to benefit
> > one
> > > department was a risk we didn't need to take.
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "Woodruff, Michael" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > Sent: Thursday, January 02, 2003 5:08 AM
> > > Subject: HP Digital Sender LDAP Connection
> > >
> > >
> > > > Has anyone used an HP 9100C Digital Sender connected to
> > Active Directory
> > > > before?  I cannot get the darn thing to work.  I have all all the
> > > > parameters correct, but get "No matching entries found"
> > when I do a
> > > > search.  I have the correct port (389), the correct IP of
> > the GC server,
> > > > and the search root is set to (DC=domain,DC=com).  If
> > anyone has any
> > > > insight on this, I would gladly pay you Tuesday for a
> > hamburger today.
> > > > Thanks.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > _________________________________________________________________
> > > > List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> > > > Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> > > > To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >
> > >
> > > _________________________________________________________________
> > > List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> > > Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> > > To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
> > _________________________________________________________________
> > List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> > Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> > To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>

_________________________________________________________________
List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to