It sounds like HIPPA is hungry hungry for resources.  

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> Sent: Tuesday, February 25, 2003 4:42 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Exchange server level encryption
> 
> 
> Except that none of our clients have heard about PGP. That's 
> one of the
> problems with HIPPA, the solutions they want don't exist for a device
> that was developed back in the 60's (I think I got the time right, I'm
> not going to check though). It's the same problem you have with cars
> today. Gasoline engines produce pollution, so to change this we could
> move to hydrogen engines which are pollution free. But the
> infrastructure isn't there. Same thing with e-mail and encryption.
> That's one of the reasons HIPPA deadlines keeps getting pushed back. 
> 
> Then with a solution like PGP you have to teach the users how 
> to use it.
> That's a nightmare that I don't ever want to repeat again. 
> Hell half of
> the users I taught have a hard time figuring out what the 
> "start button"
> is, and it's right there in front of their face. 
> 
> The big problem with HIPPA was that it was designed by 
> bureaucrats (who
> BTW were probably the same users that have a hard time with the start
> button thing) that wanted to do something to protect the people that
> vote for them. Except there wasn't a major problem to begin with. Sure
> there were a few slight mishaps here and there, but the industry was
> doing a fine job of learning from those mistakes and creating new
> solutions to prevent those from happening again. 
> 
> In addition to the design problems with HIPPA, you have the fact that
> it's become so bloated that no one knows exactly what it is 
> or what you
> need to do. While you run into some so called "HIPPA expert" that says
> you need to do one thing, you can always find another that says you
> don't need to do that. 
> 
> Flat out HIPPA needs to go, and be replaced by something 
> that's a little
> more well thought out.
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Erik Sojka
> Sent: Tuesday, February 25, 2003 1:25 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Exchange server level encryption
> 
> 
> Yup.  But PGP is one of the most widely deployed encryption 
> packages and
> has software for various client and server packages.  
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Erick Thompson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Tuesday, February 25, 2003 4:19 PM
> > To: Exchange Discussions
> > Subject: Re: Exchange server level encryption
> > 
> > 
> > Doesn't PGP suffer from the same problem, where the
> > recipients need to have
> > a PGP key set up?
> > 
> > Erick
> > 
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Ken Cornetet" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Sent: Tuesday, February 25, 2003 12:38 PM
> > Subject: RE: Exchange server level encryption
> > 
> > 
> > I'll assume you are talking about SMIME encryption here. 
> What you want
> 
> > to do is not possible in the general sense. You need the 
> recipient's 
> > public key in order to encrypt their mail. You would have to have a 
> > predefined list of all possible recipients and their public 
> keys. Even
> 
> > if you had this list, I know of no products that implement 
> this (but 
> > then again, I've never looked)
> > 
> > You could probably rig something up using PGP on a unix box as an 
> > outbound gateway. But then all your recipients would need 
> PGP to read 
> > the mail.
> > 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Hutchins, Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Tuesday, February 25, 2003 3:25 PM
> > To: Exchange Discussions
> > Subject: Exchange server level encryption
> > 
> > 
> > Ok, my eyes are going crossed.
> > I have been trying to figure out a decent way to encrypt 
> all outbound 
> > email from our company. This is for compliance with HIPAA. 
> Does anyone
> 
> > happen to have any ideas?
> > 
> > I have googled and haven't found a product that looks right. I have 
> > searched for "exchange 2000 encryption", "email encryption", etc. 
> > Help?
> > 
> > TIA
> > 
> > Mike
> > 
> > _________________________________________________________________
> > List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> > Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> > To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > 
> > _________________________________________________________________
> > List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> > Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> > To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > _________________________________________________________________
> > List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> > Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> > To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > 
> 
> _________________________________________________________________
> List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 
> _________________________________________________________________
> List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 

_________________________________________________________________
List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to