Thanks Jim, 

We do want to collapse all our sites into one AG, but we can only achieve
this by using a 2-hop method as Ed has mentioned in a previous post a few
weeks back.  Install E2K in each site, remove 5.5, switch to native, install
E2K into desired AG and move mailboxes from original site.

I started questioning it again when I re-read Tony's article, AND after a
discussion I had with Microsoft last week who also indicated that I could
simply install my E2K servers in each site, and then 'collapse them' in a
single hop.  



-----Original Message-----
From: McBee, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, 11 March 2003 5:50 p.m.
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: E2K and E2K RC1



Moving servers between admin groups was something they attempted in the
betas but coul dnot make work.   Even with Exchange 2000 in native mode,
all objects have a legacyExchangeDN associated with them.  If I remember
correctly, this was the reason that the decided it was going to be too
difficult to get working.  Like Tony, I don't remember the exact reason, but
I'm thinking that was it.  I remember doing it a few times in Beta 3 and
causing myself a lot of headaches (stores would not mount).  

If you are hoping to "re-architect" your organization, once you are in
native mode you CAN move mailboxes between servers in different admin
groups.  If this is what you want to accomplish, then perhaps this is the
best approach.

HTH,

Jim



-----Original Message-----
From: Leeann McCallum [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Posted At: Monday, March 10, 2003 4:02 PM
Posted To: Exchange Technical Mailing List
Conversation: E2K and E2K RC1
Subject: E2K and E2K RC1


I was reading an article by Tony Redmond
http://www.exchangeadmin.com/articles/print.cfm?articleID=8743 which seems
to indicate that is was possible to move servers between Administrative
Groups in RC1, yet according to everything else I've read, including Ed,
this is no longer possible in E2K SP3.

Anyone know why this was taken out?  I don't think I'm going to enjoy my
migration as much as I had hoped.

Rgds,
Leeann


NOTICE - This e-mail is only intended to be read by the named recipient. It
may contain information which is confidential, proprietary or the subject of
legal privilege. If you are not the intended recipient please notify the
sender immediately and delete this e-mail. You may not use any information
contained in it.  Legal privilege is not waived because you have read this
e-mail.

For further information on the Beca Group of Companies, visit our web page
http://www.beca.co.nz

_________________________________________________________________
List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

_________________________________________________________________
List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

NOTICE - This e-mail is only intended to be read by the named recipient.  It
may contain information which is confidential, proprietary or the subject of
legal privilege. If you are not the intended recipient please notify the
sender immediately and delete this e-mail. You may not use any information
contained in it.  Legal privilege is not waived because you have read this
e-mail.

For further information on the Beca Group of Companies, visit our web page
http://www.beca.co.nz

_________________________________________________________________
List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to