Long story. Basically I'm an IT consultant (by night, 2nd job) and I have no real PC of my own at this place - the servers (all Win2K server) are my "PC's". I'd rather not load Office/Outlook on a server if I don't have to. Two servers are DC's and a third (the one I use most) is the security checker/patch deployment/network monitoring machine that will also eventually be the Internet Connection Sharing machine, and I was hoping to avoid loading Outlook on it even though it's behind a firewall. Just seems weird conceptually to have Outlook on a machine that checks network security. Even with Outlook patched it feels like putting a bulls-eye on a bullet proof vest.
I'll probably end up using Outlook but was hoping to avoid it. Dave Lum - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sr. Network Specialist - Textron Financial 503-675-5510 -----Original Message----- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2003 09:03 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: E-mail clients Why do you not want to use Outlook? On 3/13/03 10:38, "Lum, David" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I would like an E-mail client that can talk to both POP3 and MS-Mail servers > (as well as Exchange Server capable for later) but would like to use > something other than MS Outlook, does anyone know of an alternative? A > Google search brings up a lot of hits but drilling down to see if they can > talk to MS-Mail is taking forever. > > Anyone? _________________________________________________________________ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _________________________________________________________________ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
