1. Probably, but it depends on how heavy the users are, their usage patterns (do they all log in at the same time?), and what else runs over that line.
2. I would think that it would make a whole lot more sense to have the routers tunnel to each other. Regardless of the performance, it'd be a whole lot less hassle to manage. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jean-Francois Bourdeau Sent: Wednesday, March 19, 2003 1:16 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: 25-30 external users using outlook through VPN (Exchange on a T1) Hi Queston 1 : Does anyone know if a T1 is enough to handle properly 30 external users using OUtlook 2000 through VPN I know it's a question of how much bandwith is really avalaible but suppose the T1 is only for outlook, did anyone did something with a simillar number of users coming in through VPN Question 2 : do you know if 25 seperate users VPN in (PPTP) on a remote network is using a lot more bandwith than setting up an IPSEC tunnel between the 2 sites (the one with the exchange server and the other site with 25 users) I mean : a) Site A with 25 users doing vpn(PPTP) to access the server on site B that has a T1 b) creating an IPSEC tunnel between both site and aloowing those 25 users to access exchange 5.5 through the tunnel between both site... JF _________________________________________________________________ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _________________________________________________________________ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
