I disagree with the assertion that it is _always_ bad news to outsource.
There are a number of outsourced spam filtering solutions where the
administrator can log in and access mail which had been quarantined. That
mail can then be released to the intended recipient. By outsourcing the
filtering, you are able to save on bandwidth (less mail incoming... Which
makes a difference if you're blocking 50k+ messages a day) and the
maintenance of the hardware and software is outsourced to a group which does
nothing but think about that all day. Similar things can be true of
outsourcing e-mail services in general.

Certainly outsourcing such services is not appropriate for every
organization, but by the same token there more than a few shops which insist
on doing everything in house, when all signs point to outsourcing being a
better solution for them.

On 3/21/03 9:33, "John Steniger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Gonna really suck if your CEO misses an important email and needs it STAT,
> and you need to go to a third party to get it back.....always bad news to
> take something as essential as email and put it in someone else's control.  


_________________________________________________________________
List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to