Either sounds fine to me.  I've usually followed a process like your
first option.

Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T


-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Miller, Robert
Sent: Thursday, March 27, 2003 8:28 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: X400 Connectors


All,

Have a question pertaining to X400 connectors in a mixed Site. All of
the remote Exchange 5.5 Sites have an X400 connector back to the Hub
Site. We are now in the process of introducing new Exchange2K servers in
each of the existing remote Exhange 5.5 Sites. In the near future all
mailboxes will be moved over to the new Exchange2K server, and the
Exchange5.5 server will be retired (the X400 bridgehead server in the
Hub Site will remain Exchange5.5 until funding is approved for new
hardware). I have a few test mailboxes on the Exchange2K servers, and
everything seems to work fine. I see the Exchange5.5 X400 connector for
the Sites/Routing Groups within System Manager - and options are grayed
out - which is expected. My goal is to get the X400 connector over to
the Exchange2K server so that the 5.5 server can be eventually retired.
I have done 2 different scenarios, once much less work than the other,
and both seemed to work - just wondering if one was recommended over the
other for whatever reason. My first scenario was to create a new X400
connector on the Exchange2K server back to the Hub, and change the cost
on the 5.5 X400 to 100. After confirming message flow over the new
connector I deleted the 5.5 connector. Second scenario was to change the
MTA transport stack from the 5.5 server's TCP stack to the new 2K
server's TCP stack (after I created the TCP/IP X400 Service Transport
Stack of course). Once I made this change and replication within the
Site/Routing Group took place, the 2K server was the new "owner" of the
connector, and all connector options were changeable via System Manager.
I hope this makes sense. Any thoughts?

TIA  

_________________________________________________________________
List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]


_________________________________________________________________
List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to