Cool, so you are basically saying, leave it as is for now, and if I decide to do 
anything with it wait until I am deploying the new servers to make the
changes.

For any of the upgrades I have done in the past, I build and test the new server in 
Atlanta, then ship it to the site and meet it there to do the actually
data/services migration. I am planning on doing the same rolling upgrades here. First 
with new Windows 2003 DC/File Servers, then with the Exchange servers.



----------------------- 
Miles Holt 
Network Engineer 
Summit Marketing 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
770-303-0426 
----------------------- 
"Show me a completely smooth operation and I'll show you someone who's covering 
mistakes. Real boats rock." - Frank Herbert, "Chapterhouse: Dune" 

-----Original Message-----
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2003 3:20 PM
To: Exchange Discussions

Intrasite communications[1] between servers in E2K is substantially less chatty. 
Routing groups don't have the same intense high bandwidth requirements one
generally saw imposed with Exchange 5.5.

[1] Or more properly intr-routing group.

On 4/2/03 10:56, "ml.exchange" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> We are beginning the planning for our AD migration to be followed by 
> Exchange
> 5.5 to 2K3 migration. I am looking for ideas to correct 1 main 
> shortcoming of our 5.5 Org.
> 
> We have 5 remote offices connected to our main office in Atlanta via 
> 256k frame relay. We have a Exchange server in Atlanta that runs 
> Atlanta mail and the IMC for all the other servers. Each office has a 
> separate BDC/File server and Exchange 5.5 server.
> 
> The problem is that the remote servers were not deployed as separate 
> sites, but as servers under our Atlanta site (all 6 servers are in one 
> Exchange site but different physical sites and subnets). I have two 
> questions on this configuration.
> 1) Is this going to be a problem moving forward to future versions of 
> exchange?
> 2) If so what would be the best way to fix it, either before the 
> upgrade or post/during the upgrade at each site?
> 
> Thanks for your insights!
> 
> Miles
> 
> -----------------------
> Miles Holt
> Network Engineer
> Summit Marketing
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 770-303-0426
> -----------------------
> 
> _________________________________________________________________
> List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 


_________________________________________________________________
List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

_________________________________________________________________
List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to