1000000:1? (we all know how often they happen)
-----Original Message----- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 09 June 2003 15:49 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: **NOT SPAM (ME)** Re: ** SPAM (5.50/5.00) ** RE: ** SPAM (6.00/5.00) ** RE: Change FQDN in Ex55 What are the odds? -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Andy David Sent: Monday, June 09, 2003 7:29 AM To: Exchange Discussions Best practices recommend otherwise: http://www.microsoft.com/technet/treeview/default.asp?url=/technet/prodtechn ol/ad/windows2000/plan/bpaddsgn.asp "As a best practice use DNS names registered with an Internet authority in the Active Directory namespace. Only registered names are guaranteed to be globally unique. If another organization later registers the same DNS domain name, or if your organization merges with, acquires, or is acquired by other company that uses the same DNS names then the two infrastructures can never interact with one another." ----- Original Message ----- From: "David McSpadden" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, June 09, 2003 10:19 AM Subject: ** SPAM (5.50/5.00) ** RE: ** SPAM (6.00/5.00) ** RE: Change FQDN in Ex55 > They won't authenicate through the real domain name servers..... > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Andy David > Sent: Monday, June 09, 2003 9:16 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Re: ** SPAM (6.00/5.00) ** RE: Change FQDN in Ex55 > > > What prevents them from doing that with any real domain name? > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "David McSpadden" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Monday, June 09, 2003 10:10 AM > Subject: ** SPAM (6.00/5.00) ** RE: Change FQDN in Ex55 > > > > It looks good on paper to avoid someone stealing your email domain and > > spoofing your address..... > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Andy David > > Sent: Monday, June 09, 2003 8:03 AM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: Change FQDN in Ex55 > > > > > > I don't see the point of a .loc domain myself. > > I think MS was recommending that in the early days, but generally, most > > recommendations now are to use a real domain name for your internal > network. > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Dave Vantine [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Monday, June 09, 2003 8:58 AM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: Change FQDN in Ex55 > > > > It is not the email address that I want change. Our current addressing is > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>. > > > > What I am looking to change is the SMTP header that Exchange is writing. > It > > is now writing this based upon the internal DNS information on the > Exchange > > Server. > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Sander Van Butzelaar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Monday, June 09, 2003 8:34 AM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: Change FQDN in Ex55 > > > > > > Do you want to have both .com and .loc as an email address, or only .loc? > > One way would be with a smart host that could rewrite your .loc to .com on > > outgoing mail. > > > > Sander > > _________________________________________________________________ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _________________________________________________________________ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
