A supported fix is now available from Microsoft, but it is only intended to correct the problem that is described in this article. Apply it only to computers that are experiencing this specific problem. This fix may receive additional testing. Therefore, if you are not severely affected by this problem, Microsoft recommends that you wait for the next Microsoft Exchange 2000 Server service pack that contains this fix.
I think that I'll just wait for the next Service Pack, thankyouverymuch. - Ben Winzenz Network Engineer Gardner & White (317) 581-1580 ext 418 ----Original Message----- From: Dryden, Karen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Friday, June 20, 2003 6:13 AM Posted To: Exchange (Swynk) Conversation: [Exchange2000] Possible hotfix for SMTP mail to public folders as IPM.Note not IPM.Post Subject: RE: [Exchange2000] Possible hotfix for SMTP mail to public folders as IPM.Note not IPM.Post Can someone else please try this so that we don't have to be the first one? Just kidding. Has anyone tried this yet? -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 4:54 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [Exchange2000] Possible hotfix for SMTP mail to public folders as IPM.Note not IPM.Post Just came across KB article 817809 dated May 24 which sounds like MS may have listened to our complaints about the change at E2K on the format that SMTP mail is delivered to a Public Folder. I do not recall seeing this hotfix mentioned on this list so I thought I'd post a note about it. We have many 5.5 Public Folders that receive SMTP mail and are not looking forward to the impacts of the change in E2K. http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb%3Ben-us%3B817809 <http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb%3Ben-us%3B817809> Per the article (update requires Exchange 2000 SP3): After you install this update, incoming messages to public folders have their message class cached to IPM.Note instead of IPM.Post. You can configure this new setting by creating the Incoming registry value in the following registry subkey: HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\System\CurrentControlSet\Services\MSExchange IS\< ServerName>\Public-<GUID> Value name: Incoming Value type: DWORD Value data: 0 defaults to IPM.Note. A DWORD value of 0 (zero) is default (false). A non-zero value (true) configures the public folder to cache incoming messages as IPM.Post . I'm just not clear on what they mean by the term "cache". I just saw the article and have not obtained the hotfix yet to test it. Our Exchange 2000 is still only in our lab. If any of you try it out first, let us know the results. Jane [EMAIL PROTECTED] Postmaster Team Tektronix, Inc. ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~--> Get A Free Psychic Reading! Your Online Answer To Life's Important Questions. http://us.click.yahoo.com/Lj3uPC/Me7FAA/ySSFAA/eJp0lB/TM ---------------------------------------------------------------------~-> Post message: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange 2000 FAQ: http://www.exchange-mail.org/faq.html Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ _________________________________________________________________ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _________________________________________________________________ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
