Does he have ActiveSync installed? I've had this problem before but I
never had offline folders enabled, the only thing that solved it was a
complete reinstall of the system

-Chris

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Slinger, Gary
Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2003 7:04 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Closing Outlook doesn't kill process - no pocket pc and
will go back and apply service packs.


"If the machine isn't a laptop, there's no real reason for Offline
Folders anyway"

Disagree.  All of my "power" users where I am now, and every "other
customer" job I've worked on, has OST's setup for desktops.  Allows a
server to be pulled with less impact on them (it does happen from time
to time...). Hell, I have one guy that's still running Exchange 5.0,
with circular logging enabled - full OST's on five clients, and a static
backup of the server.  He doesn't take daily backups, and is fully aware
that if there's a problem, to copy the OST's to PST's, etc.  He's never
lost a single piece of data.


-----Original Message-----
From: Joe Pochedley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2003 09:09
To: Exchange Discussions

You said that the user has offline folders enabled?  Has synchronization
finished properly?  The OST file may have become corrupt which is
causing background synch to hang the Outlook process.  Does disabling
offline folders fix the problem?  If the machine isn't a laptop, there's
no real reason for Offline Folders anyway (at least not until OL2k3's
"cached Exchange" or "Local Store" mode)....

Joe Pochedley
If you have time to do it twice,
you had time to do it right in
the first place.


-----Original Message-----
From: Michael Wade [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2003 5:23 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Closing Outlook doesn't kill process - no pocket pc and
will go back and apply service packs.


I know the whole setup is a nightmare.  If I had my way I would slick
the thing and start it from scratch.  I just have my hands full with
this job as it is... I will get back in touch with you guys after I look
at it in a day or two. 

-----Original Message-----
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2003 2:37 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Closing Outlook doesn't kill process

I didn't know you could upgrade from Me to W2k.
Anyhoo, Office 2000 with Outlook 2002 sounds like a bad mix to me. Have
you applied all the latest office service packs?


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Michael Wade" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2003 1:48 PM
Subject: Closing Outlook doesn't kill process


I've got a client using a laptop that was upgraded to Win2K from WinME.
They are using Outlook2002 and also have Office 2000 Premium installed.
They are also connected to an Exchange 2000 SBS with offline folders
enabled for their mailbox and calendar.  When starting the system up and
starting Outlook everything is fine.  However if you quit Outlook and
try and start it later the hourglass will run for a moment and then
nothing will happen. I have discovered that after quitting Outlook the
outlook.exe process stays listed in task manager's process list, and
that killing this process will allow the subsequent instances of Outlook
to run.  I have already attempted a repair but this had no effect.  I
was hoping for some input from you guys and gals before I start
uninstalling everything on their machine.

Thanks in advance,

Michael Wade
ICQ: 4927289


Michael Wade
ICQ: 4927289



_________________________________________________________________
List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]


_________________________________________________________________
List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

_________________________________________________________________
List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

_________________________________________________________________
List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang
=english
To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

_________________________________________________________________
List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]


_________________________________________________________________
List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to