Check out Imanami SmartDL (Groups controlled by a query) or WebDir (List
server capabilities for Exchange)

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bravo, Liliana
(CIP)
Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 2:17 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Creating a group list
Importance: High


Hi friends,

Do you know about of any software for manage List group ( free/cheaper)
. No hotmail or yahoo.

TIA,

LB.

 -----Original Message-----
From:   Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent:   Tuesday, August 05, 2003 3:41 PM
To:     Exchange Discussions
Subject:        Re: Server hardware specs for E2K3 (WAS: E2K
Forest/Domain-prep on Wi n2003 Domain?)

Hmm... I'm all distracted trying to figure out this google thing. Who
knew there was any other search engine on the planet beyond
www.searchbastard.com? Why would anyone bother?

Dual proc would help, but bumping up the RAM would probably help more.
If you could only do one, I'd choose the latter. Beyond that... With
users who'd fall into my 'typical category' I'd imagine you'd likely be
OK (at the very least you will be no worse of with E2K3 on this config
than you would be with E2K on it). To be clear this is a new box
correct? Because the one downside[1] to a 5.5 to E2K3 migration is that
you can't do it in place, but need to swing to new hardware.


[1] I see it as a bonus personally. [2]
[2] Seriously.
 

> From: "Dickenson, Steven" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2003 15:27:09 -0400
> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Server hardware specs for E2K3 (WAS: E2K Forest/Domain-prep 
> on Wi n2003 Domain?)
> 
> I guess the question about is it worth the money was more 
> hypothetical. I've since gotten an updated price of $370, which IS 
> worth it to me.
> 
> As far as hardware goes, I'm looking for a general "should be okay", 
> or
"not
> a good idea".
> 
> My PRIV is 6GB, PUB 30MB.  About 450 mailboxes.  On average, 50 
> clients connected at a time, with a maximum of 250 (that's how many 
> PCs we have). No idea what the mail volume is.  I'm ashamed to say I'm

> not sure how to track it.
> 
> We would be running E2K3 SE with McAfee GroupShield on Win2k3 Standard

> Server.
> 
> Hardware is P3600, 784MB of RAM, hardware RAID, 18GB RAID1
OS/Pagefile/Apps,
> 33GB RAID1 Data/Logs.  I can go dual proc if it will help.
> 
> Thoughts, ideas?
> 
> Steven
> ---
> Steven Dickenson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Network Administrator
> The Key School, Annapolis Maryland
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 3:10 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Re: E2K Forest/Domain-prep on Win2003 Domain?
> 
> 
> The hardware requirements for E2K3 vs E2K are generally equivalent,
whether
> that hardware is sufficient for you org is not really something I can 
> say with any degree of certainty. It meets the minimum hardware 
> requirements I believe.
> 
> Whether or not it is worth $1000 for you is not really a question I 
> can answer. It is for customers who hire me to do the work, since I 
> performed
my
> last E2K migration the weekend after TechEd and haven't looked back 
> since.
> 
>> From: "Dickenson, Steven" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> Reply-To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2003 13:03:45 -0400
>> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> Subject: RE: E2K Forest/Domain-prep on Win2003 Domain?
>> 
>> I have considered that, however we have Exchange 2000 EE free as part

>> of
> an
>> upgrade advantage purchased with Exchange 5.5 EE.  Upgrading to E2K3 
>> EE would cost me upwards of $1000.  Is it worth it?  In addition, I 
>> will be doing the install on a P3600 with 512MB of RAM and 3 18GB 
>> RAID1 arrays.
> Can
>> the hardware cope well?
>> 
>> PS - What the he11 does IMNSHO mean?
>> 
>> Steven
>> ---
>> Steven Dickenson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> Network Administrator
>> The Key School, Annapolis Maryland
>> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 12:58 PM
>> To: Exchange Discussions
>> Subject: Re: E2K Forest/Domain-prep on Win2003 Domain?
>> 
>> 
>> IMNSHO upgrading to W2K at this point is a waste of time. If you're 
>> going
> to
>> upgrade, upgrade to E2K3. It greatly simplifies the upgrade process 
>> from Exchange 5.5 and offers a number of significant enhancement 
>> which make it
> a
>> much more compelling upgrade story than E2K.
>> 
>>> From: "Dickenson, Steven" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>> Reply-To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>> Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2003 12:29:31 -0400
>>> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>> Subject: E2K Forest/Domain-prep on Win2003 Domain?
>>> 
>>> Hi guys,
>>> I'm getting ready to add a Windows 2003 DC to my Win2k AD network, 
>>> which will eventually be an all Win2k3 AD domain.  However, I'm also

>>> planning an Exchange 2000 upgrade in a matter of weeks.  My question

>>> is, will I be able to run Forestprep and Domainprep against the 
>>> Win2k3 AD?
> Or
>>> should I do this before adding the Win2k3 AD DC?  NOTE: I will not 
>>> be installing Exchange 2000 on a Win2003 box (for obvious reasons).
>> 
>> 
>> _________________________________________________________________
>> List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
>> Web Interface:
>> 
>
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang
>> =english
>> To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> 
>> _________________________________________________________________
>> List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
>> Web Interface:
>> 
>
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang
> =e
>> nglish
>> To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> 
> 
> 
> _________________________________________________________________
> List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Web Interface:
>
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang
> =english
> To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> _________________________________________________________________
> List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Web Interface:
>
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang
=e
> nglish
> To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 


_________________________________________________________________
List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang
=english
To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

_________________________________________________________________
List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

_________________________________________________________________
List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to