Your recipient policy will probably revert your changes back to the original sooner or later.
Sincerely, Andrey Fyodorov Systems Engineer Messaging and Collaboration Spherion -----Original Message----- From: Juancho Ciocon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, August 22, 2003 11:30 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Secondary SMTP addresses in E2k Hello folks: Happy Friday to all! Native E2k/AD infrastructure; all patched and worm-free, thank you very much. My question: if a secondary SMTP address is changed to be the primary SMTP address of an existing mailbox, will that screw things up? For a group of users, our task is to change the FROM field to the new primary address and no longer use the previous primary SMTP address. (I may be wrong but I seem to recall this could be done in 5.5 wherein the FROM field is now the "new" primary SMTP address) Sounds like spoofing, doesn't it? Perhaps I'd just better test more. Thanks in advance for any replies! -Juancho _________________________________________________________________ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _________________________________________________________________ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
