Recommended: OS: A RAID-1 physical volume. Transaction logs: One RAID-1 physical volume for each storage group. Databases: One or more RAID-5 physical volumes for each storage group.
If you don't have a lot of users, you might be able to combine the OS and logs onto a single physical volume, but I would recommend splitting it into two logical volumes. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jeroen Peters Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 3:57 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Transaction log partition size Hi List, Quick question: I'm I right when I say that the size of the partition which holds the transaction logs should be bigger as the mail volume you process between full backups? Any good links on how to set up an Exchange 2003 server, disk wise? Thanks, Jeroen Peters _________________________________________________________________ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _________________________________________________________________ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
