You mean aside from the fact that Diskeeper will not be able to defrag the drive the databases are on because the database is an open file that cannot be locked for exclusive use?
Other than that, there shouldn't be any problem with running Diskeeper on the other drives. Log files are written sequentially, so I doubt they will be very fragmented - again not much use. About the only drive that could possibly benefit would be the OS drive, and frankly, it ain't gonna change that much. Ben Winzenz Network Engineer Gardner & White (317) 581-1580 ext 418 -----Original Message----- From: Lori Sagert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Tuesday, December 16, 2003 2:57 PM Posted To: Exchange (Swynk) Conversation: Diskeeper and Exchange Subject: Diskeeper and Exchange Hello All: I would like to know if anyone has had bad/good experiences with Diskeeper running on Exchange 5.5? I do not want to implement it on our Exchange servers but Mgmt is pushing the issue. I would like to go to the meeting with some ammunition why it shouldn't be implemented. Apparently my word isn't enough...;) It might help if I can give them some concrete proof from other Exchange Admins. Any stories out there? TIA Lori _________________________________________________________________ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _________________________________________________________________ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
