Would it work if you created a local security group and added the contact
to that?
I haven't tried it, I'm just curious.

On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 12:43 PM, Michael B. Smith <[email protected]>
wrote:

> I don’t think a mail-contact is actually ever able to manage a DG. It
> doesn’t tie back to a security principal. All of the others do.
>
>
>
> *From:* [email protected] [mailto:
> [email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Orlebeck, Geoffrey
> *Sent:* Wednesday, August 19, 2015 12:14 PM
> *To:* '[email protected]'
> *Subject:* [Exchange] Managing Distribution Groups:
>
>
>
> Is it possible to grant a Cross-forest mail contact rights to manage a
> Distribution Group?
>
>
>
> We have two companies running on premise Exchange 2010 SP3 UR7. There is a
> two-way transitive AD trust and we are running Forefront Identity Manager
> 2010 with GALSync to create a unified GAL for both Forests.
>
>
>
> Someone requested to allow a user in DomainA to manage a Distribution
> Group in DomainB. From what I read, it may not be possible, as the
> “Recipient Type” has to be one of the following to manage a Distribution
> Group:
>
>
>
> ·         User Mailbox
>
> ·         Legacy Mailbox
>
> ·         Shared Mailbox
>
> ·         Mail User
>
> ·         Linked Mailbox
>
> ·         Remote User Mailbox
>
> ·         Remote Shared Mailbox
>
> ·         User
>
> ·         MailContact ß This is the one I am wondering if ‘Cross-forest
> Mail Contact’ does not fall under that category.
>
>
>
> Thank you in advance for any help.
>
>
>
> -Geoff
>
> Confidentiality Notice: This is a transmission from Community Hospital of
> the Monterey Peninsula. This message and any attached documents may be
> confidential and contain information protected by state and federal medical
> privacy statutes. They are intended only for the use of the addressee. If
> you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, or
> distribution of this information is strictly prohibited. If you received
> this transmission in error, please accept our apologies and notify the
> sender. Thank you.
>

Reply via email to