>>I know people dont recommend it, but is there any reason why
restoring a mailbox from brick would cause more corruption?
Poorly
written software, mostly. A third party application is attempting to
accomplish something the original application was not intended to do or
be. Brick level backups try to make a flat file out of a specific
database.
William
-----Original Message-----
From: Benjamin Zachary [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 03, 2001 7:28 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Brick Level Backups
From: Benjamin Zachary [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 03, 2001 7:28 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Brick Level Backups
Just
as a followup, I typically do both full backup and brick level[1], time/space
permitted. I have done so many restores of corrupted mailboxes[2] in
enviornments and have never had an issue[3] up to now. I have seen some
weird things in large stores like 20+gig, and being able to not take the entire
thing down has been a pleasent experience[4]. I know people dont recommend it,
but is there any reason why restoring a mailbox from brick would cause more
corruption?
1. I
use Veritas
2. I
use Veritas
3. I
still use Veritas
4. Do
you really need to read this agian?
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
