RE: Antigen vs. Nortons

[Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office Exchange and Bar Code Admn.]

I use NAV and it does a decent job considering it's MAPI / AVAPI based, but it does lack attachment filtering and other features that Antigen includes.  Plus, I've heard that it's use of the SE API makes it less likely to let messages slip through during times of peak traffic.

 

mit freundlichen Gr��en,(Best Regards),
Steve Ropiak
ZF Group NAO
CERT, Exchange and Bar Code Administrator
(207) 989-9115 voice
(207) 989-8722 fax
(513) 317-0197 cell
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

-----Original Message-----
From: Karen Palmer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2001 8:47 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Antigen vs. Nortons

Has a comparison been done of Nortons vs. Antigen?  We are presently using Nortons on all our servers, but since I have heard from all of you about how great Antigen is, I would like to give it a look and see if it is something we should put on our new Exchange server.  And, of course, data to back up my recommendation is always a good thing...

 

Thanks,

 

Karen

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm