Soooo many variables. Does the upgrade path fit your companies' needs? Exchange2000 is a good move, but there is a learning curve. The end users do not really see any difference aside from OWA. AD deployment should not be underestimated either.
I do not know. I like to keep plugging away at new technologies. I say go for it! William -----Original Message----- From: Jason Dwyer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 4:46 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Ex 5.5 vs Ex 2000 Now I don't want to start any fights, but we are considering implementing 2000 across the office. I have 50 staff currently running 98 on desktops and NT4 on servers I will change all servers to 2K and implement AD, but the question is really what do people think about Ex 2K? Is it better? is migration ok? secure? stable? 5.5 has been great for me so far... and you know the saying "when you on a good thing.... " Regards, Jason Dwyer List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
