Unix server acting as relay is at the collocation already but thats a good point. That server is going to hold the mail till we are back up. Part of the DR plan assumes we are going to be out of this building for a week or more.
Bob F. -----Original Message----- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2002 11:45 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Architecture question I wouldn't colo an of the Exchange boxes. I would probably put a relay server there just to hold the mail until you got your boxes back up. -----Original Message----- From: Bob Falkenberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2002 11:25 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Architecture question Hello Folks, Currently I have 4 Exchange 5.5 SP4 servers running on NT4.0 here in my server room. 3 user servers and 1 server hosting the IMC and OWA. As part of the disaster recovery plan and because of other reliability issues the head of my group wants us to move a BDC to a remote collocation. At the same time they are asking me what servers if any from the Exchange site we could move to the co-location. They have a DS3 in place for connectivity to the co-location. I don't think I want to move the user servers but can anyone give reasons not to move the IMC/OWA server to the co-location? Bob Falkenberg List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
