On Wed, 3 Apr 2002, at 9:12am, Lynn Karen wrote: > Yes: one user, works on two sites with a mailbox at each. Normally set to > automatically forward mail from here to the other site - not under my > control, which allows OOO to internet. Goes on leave and puts an OOO > message at the other end: message gets sent to him here, gets forwarded, > generates OOO back to here, gets forwarded ... by Monday morning no log > space, IS stops.
"Me too." Similar situation. Customer requires OOO-to-the-Internet to be enabled. Some user had set OOO to forward all his mail to an @home address. When @home fell off the face of the Earth, the system went bananas. <RANT> Messages sent by programs should either have a special SMTP reverse-path, or a null reverse-path. This is the way SMTP is supposed to work. Why can't Exchange get it right? </RANT> -- Ben Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | The opinions expressed in this message are those of the author and do not | | necessarily represent the views or policy of any other person, entity or | | organization. All information is provided without warranty of any kind. | List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
