|
Obviously, you have never seen a server be infected with a virus, then. We have. Even Exchange servers, that all they do is host e-mail. Since then, we have put File-scanning AV on the Exchange servers (exclude the exchsrvr directories) and Exchange-aware AV on as well, to scan all in/out mailflow.
Ben Winzenz, MCSE Network/Systems Administrator Peregrine Systems
-----Original Message-----
This is not being helpful. It is a serious question. Any viruses that actually get through Trend on the firewall will most likely get cleaned by NAV on the desktop. This seems to make AV on the server itself not necessary.
Matt
-----Original
Message-----
Hi, here is a target on my head, beat me, beat me. DOH! -----Original Message----- Do you have anything more to add to back up your statement?
Matt
-----Original
Message-----
I think it's ridiculous. -----Original Message-----
Our environment has Trend running on the firewall for anti-virus and content filtering. We have NAV running on the desktops. We are currently evaluating Antigen and SAVF (Symantec) to put on our E2K Exchange servers (including an E2K cluster on a Compaq SAN). However, our Microsoft resident is suggesting to us that AV on the servers themselves is not necessary and will only introduce problems and instability (particularly Symantec's product). He said that when a virus outbreak occurs that actually gets inside, a quick ExMerge on the server is just as effective as pushing out virus defs using the AV product. With AV software on the firewall and on the desktops, what do people think about not putting AV on the Exchange servers themselves? --
List Charter and FAQ at: List Charter and FAQ at: List
Charter and FAQ at: List Charter
and FAQ at: List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm |
Title: RE: Is virus protection on the Exchange server necessary?
- RE: Is virus protection on the Exchange server necessa... Steven Peck DNET
- RE: Is virus protection on the Exchange server necessa... Lathrum Matt-P55173
- RE: Is virus protection on the Exchange server necessa... Lathrum Matt-P55173
- RE: Is virus protection on the Exchange server necessa... Ray Zorz
- RE: Is virus protection on the Exchange server necessa... Matthew Carpenter
- RE: Is virus protection on the Exchange server necessa... Lathrum Matt-P55173
- RE: Is virus protection on the Exchange server necessa... Majetic, John RAME
- RE: Is virus protection on the Exchange server necessa... Martin Blackstone
- RE: Is virus protection on the Exchange server necessa... Moody, Jacqueline
- RE: Is virus protection on the Exchange server necessa... Lathrum Matt-P55173
- RE: Is virus protection on the Exchange server necessa... Ben Winzenz
- RE: Is virus protection on the Exchange server necessa... Lathrum Matt-P55173
- RE: Is virus protection on the Exchange server necessa... Scot Parsons
- RE: Is virus protection on the Exchange server necessa... Martin Blackstone
- RE: Is virus protection on the Exchange server necessa... Ray Zorz
- RE: Is virus protection on the Exchange server necessa... Lathrum Matt-P55173
- RE: Is virus protection on the Exchange server necessa... Matthew Carpenter
- RE: Is virus protection on the Exchange server necessa... Clayton
- RE: Is virus protection on the Exchange server necessa... Ray Zorz
- RE: Is virus protection on the Exchange server necessa... Carl Houseman
- RE: Is virus protection on the Exchange server necessa... Scot Parsons
