The inactive/evicted model is particularly effective though.

 

From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: 22 January 2008 18:36
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Anyone using CCR in production?

 

 

I think Single Node clusters are falling out of favor.  :P

 

 

 

From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2008 1:33 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Anyone using CCR in production?

 

 

I would say that clustering is falling out of favor, not CCR specifically.
Clustering adds a lot of cost and a fair bit of maintenance complexity to
get a very small up-time improvement. And if your operations folks aren't
good - it can lead to worse up-time instead of improved up-time.

 

I'm of the opinion (and it is just that - my opinion) that if you buy good
hardware to start with (redundant fans, redundant power supplies, name-brand
memory, etc.), that clustering isn't worth the cost.

 

I haven't played with Windows 2008 dispersed clusters yet. They may make it
easier and more worthwhile. I dunno yet.

 

Regards,

 

Michael B. Smith

MCSE/Exchange MVP

http://TheEssentialExchange.com

 

From: Pete Howard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2008 10:05 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Anyone using CCR in production?

 

 

Ive had a CCR implementation with 10 storage groups and about 200gb of data
running on RTM code since last August with no issues. Works great, smooth
and reliable failover ..so far. Why is CCR falling out of favor ? I can see
where it adds some complexity in setup but the MNS style clustering makes
that a lot easier. It does make patching more difficult .. I still need to
do SP1 when I have a spare minute.

 

 

Pete Howard | Systems Engineer

MCSE 3.51-2003 | ESX VCP 

* EMail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 

----- Original Message ----
From: Michael B. Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, January 21, 2008 11:43:00 AM
Subject: RE: Anyone using CCR in production?

The first two lines are about a particular client using CCR, sorry.

 

The last line is a generic statement. I wasn't clear.

 

Regards,

 

Michael B. Smith

MCSE/Exchange MVP

http://TheEssentialExchange.com <http://theessentialexchange.com/> 

 

From: Barsodi.John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, January 21, 2008 11:35 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Anyone using CCR in production?

 

 

So you guys aren't using CCR or SCC Michael?  

 

From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, January 21, 2008 8:30 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Anyone using CCR in production?

 

 

30K+ users, 2 GB hard limits, individual databases limited to 100 GB.

 

Geodispersion is coming, using Windows Server 2008. Backup is LCR to cheap
disk.

 

I'm seeing more folks moving away from clustering with LCR and SCR. Good
riddance, in my opinion.

 

Regards,

 

Michael B. Smith

MCSE/Exchange MVP

http://TheEssentialExchange.com <http://theessentialexchange.com/> 

 

From: Alex Fontana [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, January 21, 2008 1:46 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Anyone using CCR in production?

 

Curious to know what folks have seen in the field when using CCR.  How many
users, how large are your databases, any issues you've encountered.  Any
geo-dispersed clusters, special quorum configs, and how are you backing all
of it up? 

thanks!
-alex

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~             http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja                ~

Reply via email to